spend matters spend matters About this site
Advertise with Spend Matters
Advertise with Spend Matters
 

July 29, 2010

 

Barney, the Big Five, and LCCS

Earlier in the week, my wife and I left the office early one afternoon to head out to my in-laws in the suburbs. About twenty minutes into our journey, with Barney blaring in the backseat from a makeshift DVD set-up I rigged for our 2 1/2 year old son, my wife's cell phone went off. It was one of her old colleagues from a Big 5 firm who was calling from a team-room at a client site. They needed a crash course in global sourcing 101. But the irony was that they were already a number of weeks into a low cost country sourcing project that they had sold to a multi-billion dollar client. The reality was that they did not have a clue what they were doing.

You know someone does not know what they're talking about with regard to LCCS when they say "we're working on getting the suppliers to quote free on board China". Yes, a manager in the sourcing practice of a top-tier consulting firm actually came up with this phrase. I'm not funny enough to make this stuff up. But I did tell my wife after her call that perhaps she should let them know that a bunker fee is not a tax for missing the green on the 18th hole.

The major issue at hand was not whether the firm was somewhat qualified to do the work (we know full-well consultants sell things everyday that they're not exactly expert in). The issue was this team knew absolutely nothing about the basics of global sourcing (outside of the actual strategic sourcing process) or how to come up with a total cost calculation.

For example, the category they were sourcing was extremely heavy and bulky, but they did not think to ask the supplier what the best overseas transportation method was (e.g., container vs. break bulk). They also did not understand the basics of trade finance. They had started to work with a factoring company on the financial side of the transaction, but the client was a large company with good credit who could borrow better than any factoring company most likely.

In addition, the consulting team had no idea how to factor in other financing costs (e.g., letters of credit as well as inventory carrying costs and they did not have any idea about the best way to calculate accurate duties and tariffs). It was hilarious when they thought that the "financing part" would be the easy part because "they had good relationships with the finance folks inside the organization" who could help figure it out. What they had no clue on was that if the company had never sourced globally, the finance organization would be starting from the beginning just as they were.

Another clincher that the firm was not qualified to do the work was that they didn’t seem to have a grasp of what a 3PL provider could provide nor which 3PL provider they should work with. The irony is that this consulting firm invented the concept of a 4PL. But the biggest issue by far was that they probably did not have enough cost savings on the table to justify even sourcing from a low cost region. Global sourcing 101 requires accurate total cost estimates. If the total cost savings is not there, you walk away fast (or renegotiate with your supply base). My wife and her partner often compete with each other informally with their cost models to see who can get closest to total actually landed costs with their initial estimates. And this is before the actual sourcing work is done. The margin of error they shoot for is typically pennies on a unit cost basis (<1%) from estimates to implemented results.

When it comes to low cost country sourcing, this example clearly illustrates that there are few firms in the market qualified to offer advice. Yet even the biggest names in the consulting world will be happy to sell you a project team with impeccable credentials who can figure it out for you (they'll probably even have some great whitepapers and benchmark reports on LCCS to prove they know their stuff). Just give them a few weeks to come up to speed and learn what an incoterm actually is when it comes to an engagement.

- Jason Busch

Postscript (courtesy of Charles Dominick): “I love you, you love me, but you don't know how to source in a low cost country ...”


TweetBacks
Comments
vinnie mirchandani's Gravatar Jason, on one of my trips to India I was approached by a local exec of a large US SI who pleaded with me to convince his US folks to use his team more. And I was representing the buyer on this visit and this gave me a clue as to how disjointed their global proposal was.

Unfortunately, we treat some of those countries as competition that we forget they are often on our teams also - as suppliers, subsidiaries. Your crash course is just one of many global crash courses US consultants (and broadly US executives) could use...
# Posted By vinnie mirchandani | 4/14/06 7:09 AM
Jason Busch's Gravatar Vinnie,

You raise some great points. Overall, I think that far too much emphasis in the consulting circles and the SI-worlds on process expertise and industry knowledge at the expense of serving clients globally. The global component is usually secondary, or left out entirely. Some basic skills training in what it means to serve clients in a global world would go along way. This might take the form of an extension of a current discipline (e.g., extending strategic sourcing process into global sourcing insight and capability) or a deep dive on a particular region or business culture. If I were running the show at a large firm, I would mandate that everyone who is on the line (partners included) dedicate 40 hours (at least) of practice development time to learning how to help clients in a global environment.
# Posted By Jason Busch | 4/14/06 7:33 AM
Brian Sommer's Gravatar Jason -

I'll add my 2 cents on this.

I've touched on the subject in my own blog (www.servicessafari.blogs.com) several times. The fact that a consultancy has a global workforce doesn't mean that they are capable of delivering service on a global level. Just yesterday, I did a post re: a recent a BusinessWeek article on the merger mania focused on Indian outsourcers. Even though lots of companies are eager to acquire ready made, low-cost resources in India, the jury is still out as to whether any of them will successfully integrate these businesses into their own.

Creating a global delivery model requires changes to a firm's sales methods, solutions, compensation, performance metrics, staffing, and much much more. Your post takes it a step further and challenges these SIs into addressing huge holes in their skill sets, training and personnel that also must be addressed if they are to be successful in selling and delivering work.

I appreciate the post (and as a former Big 4 partner) and I hope the SIs reading it get motivated to do something different inside their firms.

Brian
# Posted By Brian Sommer | 4/14/06 7:42 AM
vinnie mirchandani's Gravatar and Jason, I would hold my periodic partner and staff meetings in emerging BRICK (Brazil, Russia, India, China, Korea) cities to at least give them a flavor for what is out there...good and bad...
# Posted By vinnie mirchandani | 4/14/06 7:48 AM
Jason Busch's Gravatar Amen ... far from the smoked salmon buffets and cocktail receptions during MBA recruiting at the top schools. Local color and flavor is what serving paying clients in a global economy is all about.
# Posted By Jason Busch | 4/14/06 10:22 AM
Charles Dominick, SPSM's Gravatar I love you, you love me, but you don't know how to source in a low cost country...
# Posted By Charles Dominick, SPSM | 4/14/06 12:38 PM
Jason Busch's Gravatar Charles,

I know you've got a growing business, but if you'd like to talk about a TV show, I might have a purple outfit that fits ...
# Posted By Jason Busch | 4/14/06 1:16 PM
Karl Waldman's Gravatar It is actually more complex than saving a couple of dollars. I have one client that is moving everything to China because it is "cheaper" than Brazil. Funny thing is that they are a fashion company and live and die by their ability to replenish the items in season. Sourcing in China doesn't allow that - Brazil would be easy 2 or 3 replenishments. Sometimes people will save 2 dollars to give up 15 dollars in margin on a hot style. (Or the reverse - by 12 extra weeks of inventory on a style that is going directly to the markdown bin).
Of course all that is measured (at least initially) is the $2 savings....
# Posted By Karl Waldman | 4/14/06 8:09 PM
vinnie mirchandani's Gravatar Karl, same thing with IT Outsourcing. I wrote a paper last year called The Economics of Cheap...offshoring is a lot more expensive than the basic hourly rates suggest (though still less than IBM, Accenture at western rates)

The darned TCO raises its head in every type of sourcing...
# Posted By vinnie mirchandani | 4/16/06 7:11 AM
Dennis Howlett's Gravatar In the world of the blind, the one eyed man is king - and so it seems in this case. What amazes me is that large companies still fall for brand image without checking customer references or past history. A simple question like: 'Show me similar clients for whom you've acted before' would have been enough to show the shortcomings of this team.
# Posted By Dennis Howlett | 4/19/06 6:23 AM
About Us | Advertising and Sponsorships | Advisory Services | Contact Us   © 2004-2010 Spend Matters, LP All rights reserved