New Research: Sourcing/Contract Management/Supplier Management in the Cloud -- Beyond BI Benefits
|
|||
|
|||
Perhaps the most predictable of all of the industries in terms of the leading sources of supply chain disruption in the latest BCI research study are transportation and storage companies. For these organizations, it's no surprise that "adverse weather (windstorm, flooding, snow, etc.)" tops the list as the leading cause of disruption. "Unplanned outage of IT or telecom systems" takes second and "industrial disputes" come in at third. At least in the US, a fourth factor to consider might be border delays across US and Mexico (and in certain cases, though on a more limited basis, Canada), although one could argue that logistics companies and manufacturers plan for such delays. Still, if there is a surprising item on this for logistics companies it's the danger of not over investing in either an internal or a third party's IT and communications infrastructure.
Investigating Future Opportunities
This investigation usually takes place by forward-thinking buyers who are willing to listen to their suppliers and re-think their own supply chain by effectively collaborating with the suppliers, having them be the innovators. Some have termed this type of sourcing "transformational" in that it could transform the supply chain, usually taking the form of alternative offers for an item. For example, a different type of material for packing boxes, a different printing and labeling mechanism, a different shipping method and delivery time or a different warehouse location.
Money Savings
In previous posts, I brought up the fact that if analysts are running analytics without using optimization, their results may come up with AN answer that satisfies all of their business criteria, but not necessarily the BEST answer. Depending on the category of the criterion, this could impact anywhere from 1-20% of the total spend.
Negotiation and Contracting Time Savings
A large problem with sourcing applications today is that they have limited or no optimization. This is particularly true in reverse auctions based solely on price.
If there are no business rules, then you are good to go -- but this is rarely the case on the items that actually have any importance within a business. This is where optimization with constraints has a huge advantage, as you are always presented with an award (allocation) that satisfies every single one. Simply keep adding them into the scenario until they are all taken into consideration, and then receive the optimal answer relative to these constraints. By doing so, you can quickly bring the award to contract and hence realize the savings faster. Since optimization engines will take into account all your business rules, you can effectively write a contract off of an award out of one of these systems.
In this next post (see the first post here) introducing Spend Matters readers to the fundamentals of sourcing optimization, we'll turn our attention to looking at the time savings benefit of applying such a toolset.
Before getting into the nuances of how best "to-do" sourcing optimization and the specific cases where it makes the most sense to apply it, I'd like to first begin by asking the question: why do we need sourcing optimization?