New Research: Services Procurement Benchmarking and KPIs -- Truth in Numbers
|
|||
|
|||
In general, procurement, HR and IT professionals do a dreadful job of leveraging analytics and complete internal/external information sets in everyday decision making in managing services suppliers and contingent spending. Worse, we delude ourselves into thinking that running the occasional report on a monthly or quarterly cycle makes us strategic (hint: it doesn't). Granted, we're always looking for some information to help justify a sourcing or related decision. But our modus operandi for the mundane and routine is more likely to damage our credibility to truly be strategic than to enable a greater degree of respect and trust among stakeholders.
In my first real job out of graduate school, I spent much of my day analyzing structured and unstructured information to come up with potential scenarios for companies, industries and markets. The firm I worked for specialized in what's known among corporate strategy-types as "scenario planning." This type of scenario modeling work differentiates from purely data-driven financial and supply chain forecasting exercises by introducing qualitative inputs as well as enabling participants in the exercise to have a say, and in fact participate in the outcome and analysis that results. I've always found scenario approaches for conceiving where the future may take us to be a useful exercise, and one that can be accomplished in surprisingly pragmatic ways with actionable output. Moreover, scenarios can help inspire those who either participate in their creation or review the resulting materials. In our latest Spend Matters Compass research brief, The Future of Procurement Analytics and Content -- Three Scenarios For Company Adoption, we've attempted to bring alive multiple scenarios for where analytics and embedded content will take procurement in the future based upon technology that is available is today.
We're excited to announce the availability of our most fun -- and we believe most insightful -- research analysis of procurement BPO to date: Tips for Making the Promised BPO Benefits Real -- Alignment, Focus and Integration. The paper, co-authored by HfS' Phil Fersht and Spend Matters' Jason Busch, personalizes what it takes to get the most from procurement BPO relationships. The secondary title just about says it all: "Jason Busch and Phil Fersht Apply Lessons From Dating and Marriage to Procurement BPO." Despite the whimsical lead-in, this Compass research brief is not all fun and games (though we hope the more informal tone will leave you amused). In fact, the analysis offers some highly prescriptive areas for company introspection before heading down the BPO path (e.g., process maturity examinations, dangers of "lift and shift" thinking and skills, and knowledge awareness) as well specific advice on what potential partners should bring to the table.
We're excited to announce our latest free research Compass Research brief, Beyond Basic Scorecarding -- Supplier Performance and Development Approaches to Drive Competitive Cost and Risk Advantages. The paper is part of Spend Matters Compass Series IV: Next Level Supplier Management -- Technology, Practices and Approaches for Cost Reduction, Risk Improvement and Supplier Development. If you're curious, you can also check out other recent papers in the series Leveraging Supplier Management Platforms for Multiple Goals: Risk Reduction, Supplier Diversity and CSR and Supply Risk Management -- Segmenting the Technology and Content Landscape and Choosing the Right Category of Solutions. In our latest supplier management research, we've opted to go deep on scorecarding and supplier performance management, topics that do not get enough attention on these pages, let alone anywhere else. Featuring insights from Spend Matters contributors Jason Busch and Sherry Gordon, the free research download is essential reading for those getting started with or accelerating supplier performance management programs.
Today, Spend Matters and HfS Research announce the first paper in their jointly authored research series: Expecting More From Procurement BPO. For those who don't know HfS, the firm has quickly grown from a means for CEO Phil Fersht to hide his costly single malt collecting habit from his lovely wife into a rapidly expanding global powerhouse on the BPO analyst front with an open expense account at all the Mandarin Orientals (and a few more dodgy establishments as well). While some might suggest the concept of this jointly authored series grew out of Phil's and my desire to collaborate on an analyst/research model in the spirit of the convivial execs in Mad Men, the truth is that we started working together on this thing because we were both flabbergasted by the opportunity that procurement BPO presents for many companies in contrast with the lack of sustaining value delivered in past engagements. Thus the charter behind this joint research series was born: to highlight how procurement BPO should work in practice based on lessons learned, both past and present.