spendmatters
 

May 21, 2012

 

Supplier Selection: Five Questions to Ask to Make Sure Your Adviser is as Objective as Possible

Last week, I shared the details surrounding Infor's anonymous paid referral program that was introduced and subsequently cancelled in less than 24 hours. One of the scarier things about this incident isn't that the initiative made its way through the Infor commercial organization and out to potential "influencers," but that many such programs are happening today, and without much knowledge of the fact. Whether it's technology, services, office products, IT equipment or other spend categories, vendor-paid channel referral fees -- some of which are certainly below the surface -- have been around for decades. And some, such as those captured by group purchasing organizations (GPOs), are even part of the core business model for intermediaries.

Regardless of category and intermediary relationship, I believe the onus should be on procurement organizations to ensure that they are representing their organization's best spending interests by investing any potential conflicts of interest among those influencing -- or facilitating -- a decision on their behalf. This may include industry analysts, bloggers, consultants, GPOs and others. To help with this effort, I think, as a start, there are five questions that every procurement organization should ask of potential advisers and channels:

  1. Do you (or does your organization) receive any direct or indirect compensation from the supplier for referring business based on product, solution or service recommendations and/or referrals?
  2. Is this information disclosed (or not) through any public means?
  3. If "yes," is the compensation tied directly to volume and revenue generated for the vendor or is there an incentive based on another mechanism?
  4. Do you currently have any other type of commercial relationship with the supplier that you are recommending, or do you hold any type of equity or other financial upside in this vendor? If so, what is the extent of the relationship and do you work with other competitors to the vendor in question?
  5. Are there any suppliers that you do not work with commercially that you have referred business to in the past in this supply market? If so, who?
These questions are obviously just a start. But hopefully they'll serve to help as a discovery process to better understand whether your informal or formal adviser is as objective as they might claim or seem or the surface.

- Jason Busch


TweetBacks
Comments
Charles Dominick, SPSM's Gravatar Jason,
I agree totally. This is a very useful post and one that should be bookmarked by every procurement professional.

I would also add that similar questioning should be done of any adviser that recommends against going with a certain supplier. Why are they recommending against going with that supplier? How well or poorly versed is the advisor in that particular market? Have they had or observed first-hand a bad experience with that supplier? etc.

I've seen supplier selections unnecessarily change when an adviser recommended against a supplier based on his abject ignorance of the market and a fear of admitting that the client may actually know more than the advisor.

Advisors are great to have, but giving unchecked trust to them is foolish as you have revealed in your coverage of this matter.
# Posted By Charles Dominick, SPSM | 1/11/11 8:32 AM
About Us | Advertising and Sponsorships | Advisory Services | Contact Us    © 2004-2012 Azul Partners, Inc. and Spend Matters. All Rights Reserved.