spendmatters
 

February 03, 2012

 

Friday Rant: Ariba's Cloud -- Net Impressions

Down in Orlando this week for Ariba LIVE, it was pretty clear that there was a changing of the positioning guard. Ariba attempted to leave behind the pack of procurement software providers by moving into its own cloud, 30,000 feet above the procurement, finance and supplier organizations it intends to enable and help transact more effectively with a new enabling intermediary positioning and role. Ironically, this position as a cloud provider harkens back to earlier marketplace positioning back in the Ariba/Tradex and Commerce One days -- yet there are some major differences this time around.

For one, the technology to enable a cloud-like vision is real today. Consider:

  • SaaS makes software acquisition and usage costs for both buyers and suppliers that much lower today

  • Roll-out costs are lower (often by an order of magnitude) than a decade ago

  • Integration costs (system-to-system and inter-company) is that much lower risk and cost effective today

  • Supplier networks are now enabling complex commerce in addition to paperclips and pencils

  • Businesses (procurement and finance) are looking for tangible results (e.g., cash take-out) rather than the ability to IPO their spend; suppliers are looking to generate incremental, high margin revenue rather than simply big-bang, high-leverage technology investments

  • Ariba's end-to-end product suite vision is real. Granted, Ariba has stronger capabilities in certain areas than others, but starting with spend analysis and progressing all the way through invoice/working capital management and payment, the technology exists today versus simply posing as cloud vapor

This is all positive news -- but the cloud also brings new types of risks for Ariba. Not only must they expend marketing capital evangelizing what it actually means for customers, they must also not take their eye off the product functionality ball in their core products. After all, companies still base technology buying decisions on functional capabilities versus a high-level commerce connectivity vision. I'd like to see Ariba spend part of the airtime it's positioning with the cloud in investing in truly leading product innovation and staying on their solution message.

Incidentally, I believe they're doing this in some areas (e.g., working capital), but not across the board. For example, what about delivering "cloud" optimization capabilities in software and as a service as strong as CombineNet and Trade Extensions (not to mention Emptoris, BravoSolution and Iasta) for logistics and other complex spend areas? What about enabling "cloud" line-item cost breakdowns tied to pricing indices in spend visibility for select spend categories (e.g., stampings, forgings, freight) to help customers understand the exact implications of commodity price movements and surcharges based on total cost vs. just showing a general price trending chart? What about creating a social network for companies sourcing like-categories that are non-strategic? (OK, Ariba Exchange is a good start here).

Ariba must not take its eye off potential breakthrough innovation (not to mention driving to functional/solution parity with niche best-of-breed providers in key modular areas). If they can keep the cloud vision and make these investments, the sky will be the potential solution limit. Stay tuned for further analysis of Ariba's cloud, including the channel/partner (consulting, systems implementation, BPO, supplier) implications in the coming weeks.

- Jason Busch


Commodity Edge Conference

TweetBacks
Comments
Anthony Calabrese's Gravatar Good thoughts, Jason. I think Ariba's big push to create a SaaS product definitely impacted their feature-set innovation in a negative way. Look at their services procurement capabilities after gobbling up [forgot the name of the vendor] they let it sit dormant while FieldGlass captured market share. They could have dominated that area (or maybe they purchased the wrong company?), but the push to SaaS diverted their attention. I think the same thing goes for the contract management software company they purchased.

I walked away with a similar impression of Ariba having the core capabilities they spoke about. However, I just don't see how Ariba gets more customers from this. The biggest issue Ariba has is that their deployed based uses only 10% of the feature set [you probably know the real number]. I don't see how a SaaS offering will help customers get the gumption, savviness, or the excitement to get the value from the other 90%.

It may all come down to the value purchasing organizations see and are actually able to materialize by using best practices...

On the other hand, if your suspicion about 2010 acquisitions is true, this could have been the most interesting pre-acquisition event I've seen in a while...could the ASN actually improve their attractiveness to an ERP vendor.
# Posted By Anthony Calabrese | 5/28/10 10:30 AM
Russ's Gravatar One thing I had reinforced to me by several Ariba people was that Ariba thinks they have turned a corner with SaaS. They had focused much of their attention on getting on-Demand stable and functional. 10s2 represents the finish in the move to SaaS, 10s3 and beyond are to focus on the innovation to keep ahead of the competitors.

They also recognize that you have to deliver results as well as discuss the Gee Whiz. How they move forward with that balance will determine what we think of them come the next Live.
# Posted By Russ | 5/28/10 2:08 PM
Finbarr's Gravatar One big difference between Ariba's posiitoning and that of 10 years ago is that back then their position was that they enabled others to create marketplaces. Today, they're really a marketplace themselves (enabled by good technology, liquidity and some buzz with the cloud positioning).
# Posted By Finbarr | 6/10/10 1:49 PM
Steve's Gravatar Not sure how SaaS makes integration cheaper. If anything it becomes more complex and less secure in a SaaS to behind the firewall than solely behind the firewall integration. Please explain your rationale.
# Posted By Steve | 6/15/10 12:13 PM
Jason Busch's Gravatar Steve,

My comment around integration costs is that my anecdotal observation is that API-based integration is less expensive than it was ten years ago. Custom development is also less as well, thanks to offshore resources. However, you are correct that SaaS-based integration is not always a walk in the park, as companies are discovering when it comes cloud P2P integration between Ariba and other third-party systems (e.g., VMS, asset management, etc.) I believe this is a temporary hiccup -- at least I hope -- to enable an ultimate cloud integration vision
# Posted By Jason Busch | 6/15/10 12:56 PM
About Us | Advertising and Sponsorships | Advisory Services | Contact Us    © 2004-2012 Azul Partners, Inc. and Spend Matters. All Rights Reserved.