spendmatters
 

February 09, 2012

 

Purchasing To Shut Down -- A Sad Day in Publishing and Procurement

Earlier this morning, Reed Business Information announced it would shut down all of its 23 remaining trade publications within its portfolio. It had recently attempted to sell its trade titles and was able to find buyers for some publications (21 in total), but a number remained, despite material interest in some of them, which I heard about from various sources. Among the procurement and supply chain titles that are folding, I've learned that Purchasing, Supply Chain Management Review, Modern Material Handling, and Logistics Management will shut down by the close of business today (Friday, April 16). According to an online source I located, the complete list of affected titles includes: "Building Design+Construction, Chain Leader, Construction Bulletin, Construction Equipment, Consulting-Specifying Engineer, Control Engineering, Converting, Foodservice Equipment & Supplies, Graphic Arts Blue Book, Graphics Arts Monthly, HOTELS, Logistics Management, Material Handling Product News, Modern Materials Handling, Plant Engineering, Professional Builder, Professional Remodeler, Purchasing, Restaurants & Institutions, Semiconductor International, Spec Check, Supply Chain Management Review and Tradeshow Week."

Earlier this morning I had the chance to catch up with an old friend and industry colleague, Doug Smock. Doug remains one of the most established and respected editorial voices in the procurement, supply chain and engineering arenas. A former editor of Purchasing, he has a long history (three decades) with the publication. Doug told me, "It's a very sad day. Purchasing has a long and storied history, and I was very proud to have been involved with it for many years, including four as a chief editor. Purchasing was very unusual among the trades because of the very strong bond it held with its audience -- great people like Gene Richter, Tom Stallkamp, and Shelley Stewart. I have not personally been involved with Purchasing for more than four years, but I will greatly miss it." As will I.

Here's the big question: what led to this title's demise? One theory suggests the answer has little to do with the evolution of the online publishing sector. Rather, it goes back decades to a fundamental shift in the US manufacturing business. According to Doug, "Purchasing's revenues came from largely manufacturing companies going back into the 1970s. Eventually, much of that business moved to Asia and producers, distributors and manufacturers stopped advertising, which then started a downhill slide." So there you have it. Ironically -- because they covered the topic so well -- we can directly thank global sourcing for Purchasing's downturn.

Stay tuned for further coverage of Purchasing's closure in the coming days.

- Jason Busch


Commodity Edge Conference

TweetBacks
Comments
Charles Dominick, SPSM's Gravatar Jason,
"A sad day" indeed describes it best. Overall, Purchasing had high-quality, prolific coverage of the sector. I know that I, my employees, and many of our students will miss it.

We will also miss Purchasing's advertising and lead generation opportunities, particularly its Resource Center. Perhaps this represents a profitable opportunity for the top bloggers out there (hint, hint).

Purchasing had a fantastic staff of writers and editors. If any of them are looking to stay in the sector, I encourage them to reach out to me as their sudden availability just so happens to coincide with our growth.

Farewell, Purchasing. Thank you for your contribution to the profession.
# Posted By Charles Dominick, SPSM | 4/16/10 1:32 PM
Buh bye's Gravatar Tough for them personally, but it's way past time for Purchasing to go the way of the dinosaur.
# Posted By Buh bye | 4/16/10 1:40 PM
Jeff's Gravatar Shocking to say the least...if only because yesterday someone called to inform me that I was going to begin receiving a complimentary copy of Purchasing....color me confused.
# Posted By Jeff | 4/16/10 4:44 PM
Mark Perera's Gravatar Real shame to see Purchasing come to an end. If there are any of the editorial team out there reading this please contact me, as I am sure the Procurement Leaders team will be keen to talk as we continue expansion of the PL network into the globally

Best way to contact me is via www.markperera.me or via twitter my handle is @markperera
# Posted By Mark Perera | 4/18/10 9:48 AM
Mark Usher's Gravatar Yes, a great shame indeed. I assume this also means the end of the Purchasing.com web site? I think Charles has a good point about some form of reincarnation of the high value knowledge base of accumulated materials making sense. My take is that this isn't anything to do with irrelevant subject matter but the basic print publication revenue model. A web-based Purchasing Next Generation would either have to some type of subscription model or a low/zero cost true blog/networking knowledge-sharing approach. Anyway, thanks Purchasing Team for all your incredibly high value contribution to this discipline over the years!
# Posted By Mark Usher | 4/18/10 1:43 PM
Emel Gomulka's Gravatar Just found out that SCMR is acquired by another company in the last minute and it is continuing business as usual. I don't know yet whether Purchasing mag was part of this deal.
# Posted By Emel Gomulka | 4/28/10 3:26 PM
the doctor's Gravatar Not a done deal yet. See this article:

http://packagingrevolution.net/modern-peerless/

Peerless Media has reached an agreement "in principle" to acquire RBI's Supply Chain Group (SCMR, Logistics Management, MMH, and MHPN).

Good chance it will happen, but 11th hour deals can fall apart before the clock strikes midnight.

And even if it does happen, as the group obviously wasn't profitable, it is likely there would be some changes.
# Posted By the doctor | 4/29/10 8:58 AM
Anon's Gravatar Michael, what exactly do you know about this group's profitability? What evidence do you have to make that comment?
# Posted By Anon | 4/30/10 9:43 AM
Jason Busch's Gravatar I can't speak to Purchasing's profitability, but my money is on Purchasing relaunching. Either someone will buy the assets (unlikely, but there are multiple parties interested ) or the Publisher will launch something new with part or all of the previous team (Kathy has first dibs on buying the assets, as did the other Publishers of the Reed titles which were not sold before the shutdown). That's what happened with the supply chain titles.

I personally hope there's life left in print. Fingers crossed that older models can reform into new. It's good for everyone.
# Posted By Jason Busch | 4/30/10 9:46 AM
About Us | Advertising and Sponsorships | Advisory Services | Contact Us    © 2004-2012 Azul Partners, Inc. and Spend Matters. All Rights Reserved.