spend matters spend matters About this site
Advertise with Spend Matters
Advertise with Spend Matters
 

July 29, 2010

 

Coupa and Ariba -- Analyzing Competitive Claims (Part 3)

In this third post in the series analyzing Coupa's competitive claims against Ariba (click here for Part 1 and Part 2), I'll turn my attention to the remaining claims Coupa makes against its Sunnyvale P2P neighbor (in case you're curious, Coupa's office is just out of mortar range of Ariba's West Coast HQ, but it's still close by my calculations, especially depending on how the purchasing winds blow on any given day ...) But I digress -- let's get back to Coupa's comparison list and do a fact check on its remaining claims as quickly as possible.

One of Coupa's claims is that it includes executive dashboards that "provide easy access to actionable spend analysis, actual savings data, and predictive spend forecasts" compared with Ariba, which does "not include" dashboards and requires "additional modules ... to perform analysis against procurement transaction flow." My verdict here is that Coupa is largely accurate. Although Ariba does have reporting capability within P2P, I would not put its dashboards in the same class as Coupa's from an overall visual impact perspective. Still, Coupa somewhat misses the boat in this comparison.

Reporting capabilities in a spend/supply management suite must transcend P2P. In fact, the more valuable reporting comes from examining a combination of direct/indirect/services spend -- which Coupa does not capture in its entirety. So while Coupa may provide better indirect eye candy, it'll leave organizations in the dark when it comes to the bulk (usually 75% or more) of their purchasing activities conducted outside the scope of an indirect eProcurement system. Now, Ariba does not have the best spend visibility reporting, dashboard interface, or analytics capability in the market (different solution providers take the prize in each of these areas). But it does have a decent overall visibility and reporting solution in this area in comparison to Coupa, which is only able to report on spending through its own system.

Coupa is again wrong -- and right -- when it comes to its claim that Ariba does not have "predictive analytics and alerts" to supporting forecasting spending into future periods. Here, Coupa says that its own solution features "easy-to-manage real-time alerts [that] inform managers and executives of spending thresholds and budget compliance even when they are not logged into the system." Through Ariba's workflow capabilities (which are quite strong), it's relatively easy to configure automated items including alerts, although I'm not sure I'd classify these as predictive, as Coupa is claiming (but I'm not sure if Coupa's are actually predictive in the sense they're algorithm or constraint driven). Still, in their favor, Coupa is set up for a more non-web and mobile environment to provide insight into activities through alerts. However, it would not be a big deal to create this with Ariba through an integration hub or model (e.g., Tibco) and customize it to the Nth degree if one were so inclined.

When it comes to "built-in budgeting support" Coupa says that "at login, managers see spend against budgets they own as it occurs, complete with drill down functionality to the purchase order and original requisition. Plus [we also offer] automatic adjustment functionality based on downstream events." Coupa questions whether Ariba has the capability to support "intra-period analytics within the application that allow managers [to] monitor spend vs budget as it happens." This is a bit of a loaded comparison because it's not apples to apples. Coupa may have a more elegant and simple approach to intra-period indirect reporting, but Ariba, per my earlier comment, provides a more complete -- although not perfect -- picture into total spending. Still, both approaches come up complete short of what's really needed in the market: a CDI/supplier hub capability that provides a full snapshot of spending and supplier activity across internal and external data sources at the point of query -- in real-time. So I'll grant Coupa a small victory in its claim here, but it's a partial one, at best.

Next, Coupa claims that it enables "Google-Like Search" capabilities that provide "A single query [that] launches parallel searches against hosted catalogs, form templates, how-to-buy policies, and the web, and renders unified search results that even include appropriate punchout suppliers" versus Ariba, which does not enable "users [to] search across multiple objects in the system." I personally have not checked out Ariba's latest search capability, but I know that previous versions offered parametric search features to consider different attributes across multiple sources. If the Spend Matters audience could chime in here, let's get other opinions on what Ariba currently has. I highly doubt that you can't launch a unified search, but I could be wrong. Regardless, you could easily attach a Vinimaya-like capability onto Ariba if you wanted greater flexibility to pull, query, and analyze results from truly distributed environments that would trump Coupa. My verdict? I need more information to analyze Coupa's claim.

In other areas including "Inventory Management, Supplier Network, Centralized & Desktop Receiving, P-Card Support, Invoices, RFQ and Superhero Mascot" Coupa has checkbox comparisons with Ariba that do not go into detail but do suggest parity. The depth of what each vendor can do in some of these areas is really what separates one solution from the other. Especially when it comes to supplier networks, invoice management, and RFQ capabilites, Coupa is not even playing on the same field as Ariba, let alone the same sport. This could change as Coupa builds out capabilities in these areas, but right now, Coupa checking the box across these functional areas in direct comparison to Ariba is a bit like France checking the box as an historic military superpower in comparison to the United States. Yes, both have standing armies (some are better at retreating than others) and a few nukes to threaten unruly neighbors, but the comparison stops there. We all know what happens when France goes to war and who comes to the rescue each time, in modern history. Which is precisely what Ariba might have to do with larger Coupa customers who think they're getting the same thing in these areas, but then discover the difference between claimed and actual capabilities.

Stay tuned for a final post in this series next week when we go into more detail on these three areas and more. I promise to keep any more Italian motorbike and French references out of it ...

But in the meantime, do stay tuned for a post tomorrow or Thursday looking at Coupa's recent product announcement which was overshadowed by it's anti-Ariba campaign. Under the surface, there's some good product news to report.

- Jason Busch


TweetBacks
Comments
Jason Hekl's Gravatar I want to thank Jason for his posts on the chart comparing Coupa e-Procurement to Ariba Buyer (http://www.coupa.com/resources/product-compare/sch...). More than 4,500 words of commentary have been published on SpendMatters (with more to come) in response to a comparison chart containing just 585 words. This is terrific! We’ve struck a nerve and prompted a much-needed discussion where everyone has the opportunity to offer his or her opinion. The market for e-procurement solutions is healthier than most people realize, for companies of all sizes. There are viable alternatives to Ariba and ERP purchasing modules. And Coupa is one of them.

Of course, if you’re evaluating e-procurement software, opinions only go so far. Jason doesn't use Coupa or Ariba every day, and though a qualified expert on procurement topics, he's not a practitioner. His opinion is but one voice to consider. Analysts offer another. Vendors offer a third. Customers for the respective solutions form a fourth (Coupa’s are a particularly vocal lot - http://www.coupa.com/customers/).

The most important opinion, though, is the one you form on your own. And it can be difficult to form that opinion without first getting your hands on the software to fully appreciate how it may or may not work for your organization. That’s why Coupa offers prospective new customers a fully functional system to trial, without commitment – we want you to experience Coupa directly and decide for yourself if it has the transformational potential to cross that last mile and drive broad user adoption and greater spend under management (sign up for the free trial at http://www.coupa.com/free-trial/).

Coupa’s mission is to help companies spend smarter and save more. It’s about using technology to foster a cost-conscious and thrifty culture. It’s about moving from a culture of mandates to a culture of self-empowerment, where people ask to participate, because it’s in their best interest to do so, and because they want to. It’s about satisfying the 80/20 rule and transforming how organizations think about and control their indirect spending.
# Posted By Jason Hekl | 3/9/10 12:01 PM
Pierre Mitchell's Gravatar Wow, this coup from Coupa is very impressive! No, not the well-crafted self-congratulatory infomercial by JasonH, but rather, what Dave and team have crafted in terms of trickle-up technology from B2C buying and bringing it to B2B.

In particular, the "guided buying" idea seems to be getting close to reality!!! I've been pining for this and prodding the vendors in the space to do this for over a decade. Jason mentioned it back in 2006.

Why the rant? (for those who know me - yes - it's time to roll your eyes on this again)....

Procurement works so hard to set up 'preferred supply': commodity schema, approved / preferred supplier lists, contracts, buyers/managers associated with aforementioned, inventory associated with aforementioned, evaluative attributes for aforementioned (which can be put in a catalog and/or used in parametric search), additional business rules (if person of role A is wanting to buy sub-commodity B for C Dollars in Region D with specs E - etc.),
BUT....

Users are then forced into a crappy user experience that doesn't use this notion of preferred supply to guide them to the right buying channel and right supplier. They must then fruitlessly search using just the right queries. Those of you using the "%" wildcard know exactly what I'm talking about. Inside joke. The Coupa guys get it I'm sure.

No, they must be punished for not getting the Procurement memo on where on the intranet to go to get them to the "shantytown portal" mall that has been cobbled together with punchout links, local catalogs, etc. We then forensically go through the AP history, find the mavericks, and them punish the wicked for their transgressions!

And we wonder why the internal customer satisfaction metrics are less than stellar!

Guided buying creates the proverbial cherry on top by combining distributed search, real-time auto-classification (can we please get this as a free self-learning web service please?), taxonomy management (x-ref; drill-around; and tying to master data like contracts, ASLs, inventory locations, buyer/manager contacts, etc.), parametric search if needed, and various metadata around the spend categories. All this is hidden from the user of course who is quickly guided to right place. The good news is that all the individual technologies already exist - I won't name all the names.

Example: Type in "mouse". Pop-up: Lab animal or computer peripheral? Former? off you go to animals category leader (pharma example here folks). Latter? Out to the Dell punchout site you go. The category has no preferred supply and is a big buy? off to the designated sourcing person to assess for a quick strat sourcing processes or off to tactical sourcing group in the COE or BPO provider. Or if it's a small amount, then let the end user go price shopping like Coupa's iRequest. I actually really like the 'frugal meter', although it could easily get a bit creepy - like Microsoft paper clip guy - but with a nagging yiddish accent... "Hey Bubba, do you REALLY need the Dale Earnhardt commemorative safety goggles vs standard issue? Do you really have the budget? You've burned through 75% of it - and it's only February!"

I've road tested the concept with literally about 20-30 CPO clients over the last decade and they LOVE the idea. But, until it starts showing up on the "Feature 500" list for vendors, it won't get built. I hope that changes with this.

Anyway, there is plenty of innovation white space left in Procurement and am happy to see it accelerating.

JasonB - this could have been a Friday Rant! sorry for the length.
# Posted By Pierre Mitchell | 3/9/10 6:56 PM
Jason Busch's Gravatar Pierre,

Rants are usually more style than substance. This is substance. Keep preaching from on high with your guided buying concept. It was ahead of its time, but could finally be catching on. I think it will take a content or content indexing company (e.g., Google) for it to really catch hold ...
# Posted By Jason Busch | 3/10/10 6:20 AM
About Us | Advertising and Sponsorships | Advisory Services | Contact Us   © 2004-2010 Spend Matters, LP All rights reserved