spendmatters
 

February 09, 2012

 

Aberdeen Loses Another Procurement Analyst: Andrew Bartolini

When Tim Minahan left Aberdeen to head to Procuri five years ago, the average tenure of procurement analysts at the firm dropped from years to quarters -- and in some cases, mere months. As some predicted at the time, Aberdeen would never be able to regain the research bench strength that Tim and his team once had. But Andrew Bartolini, who came in a couple of years ago, finally created some stability in the ranks. Earlier this week, however, Andrew quietly left the firm for a new venture that he is in the process of launching. Even though I don't know the details yet -- I am hoping to catch up next week at the Procurement Leaders event in Chicago -- I am sure he'll continue to build on his relationships and work in his previous endeavor. But where does this leave Aberdeen?

The answer is: most likely shopping for yet another analyst to scrape together benchmark reports that quite often seem to blend together. First, they'll need to remove Andrew from the website. More important than Aberdeen, however, is what Andrew's departure signifies for the analyst and advisory community -- the importance of placing as much emphasis on the individuals as the firms you deal with. If you're contracting with AMR, for example, to gain research intelligence specifically in procurement and supply chain, you might try to negotiate a contract that stipulates an out clause if key analysts leave in the wake of the Gartner acquisition (my bet is that no more than 50% will remain after a year). In the analyst world, the individual is what counts, unless of course, they're subsumed by the Gartner research Borg (they are currently in the process of assimilating AMR).

Increasingly, the Internet is helping individuals create brands that transcend those of established firms in niche areas. It's as much about the credibility of the personal brand as it is the firm where someone decides to hang their shingle. The quick rise of new firms and analyst models like Altimeter Group and Horses for Sources (which are filled with top former analysts from Forrester and AMR, among others) suggest that this previously risk-averse profession, where top players would "take one for the firm," is quickly becoming a market where top talent views itself as fluid and mobile. In the case of Aberdeen, I wish Andrew all the best in his new endeavors. I would encourage all those who had a positive working relationship with him at Aberdeen to follow the individual rather than the brand. Moreover, given his departure from Aberdeen, I would be cautious about the veracity of Aberdeen's forthcoming research and benchmarks in the area, and would encourage companies interested in leveraging benchmarks to not go halfway, but rather work with pros like Hackett Group, who've been able to keep top notch advisers like Pierre Mitchell and Chris Sawchuck for years. This is a case where you really do get what you pay for (or don't, for that matter).

- Jason Busch


Commodity Edge Conference

TweetBacks
Comments
former client's Gravatar Andrew is a good guy with a solid grasp of the sector. I am sure he will be successful whatever path he decides to go down.
# Posted By former client | 3/18/10 3:20 PM
Susan Scrupski's Gravatar Hi Jason. I've been meaning to pay you a high compliment. One of our members (multi-national, multi-billion dollar, public company) works in Procurement. He told me in no uncertain terms, "Jason Busch is THE GUY in Procurement." He admitted he actually met you once, but it was as if he were talking about, well, you know-- a rock or movie star. He even complained to me that his management, and folks outside of Procurement, are still wedded to the Gartners/Forresters quotes when they present internally. This frustrated him because he knows, bar none, you know this space better than any cowboy on the plains.

So, for what it's worth, the independent analysts are recognized in their fields for their expertise/thought leadership, but the big brands can still invest in the awareness and executive relationship-building in ways the smaller outfits can't. Just look at the ratio of sales pros to analysts in any of the large firms. In the end, it's "the thought" that counts, but the huge voice the analyst firms have created is the gift that will keep giving for a while now in tech. I personally feel it's an unsustainable model, but I have a longer view of its demise than I did originally. Although I commented on a post yesterday that another one of my members, a former analyst with one of the top firms, predicted we will see a severe brain drain (and subsequent scaling back of AR budgets with big firms) as soon as later this year.
# Posted By Susan Scrupski | 3/18/10 4:54 PM
Kevin Potts's Gravatar What a tremendous loss for Aberdeen. Let's hope it is not a loss for this space. I have tremendous respect for Andrew based on a decade-long professional relationship, which predates his time at Aberdeen, Ariba and CommerceOne. What always impressed me about him was his innate understanding of the financial impact of everything he researched. His strong grasp of the numbers (e.g., how supply management strategies and technology impact return on assets, return on invested capital, working capital and cash flows) are unique in the analyst community, and it will make him an asset wherever he lands. We at Emptoris wish him well.

Kevin Potts
VP Product Management and Marketing
Emptoris
http://emptorisinc.blogspot.com

Kevin Potts
# Posted By Kevin Potts | 3/19/10 4:46 AM
Jason Busch's Gravatar Susan,

Wow. What an awesome bit of feedback. I don't look at myself as a rock star -- just someone who loves the subject that I'm able to study, think, write and speak about everyday.

It would be nice to have greater respect outside of the practitioner community in the executive ranks. But these things take time. The hilarious thing is being on the inside of IT -- sorry for the pun -- is that we both know that such a large number of analysts working for big name shops are really just hiding beneath a corporate brand (there are great exceptions to this, of course -- but more and more, the best are going out on their own because why would they give away 90% of the revenue they generate to fund Colony's gifts to Harvard).

I've personally found that independent analysts/bloggers and often consultants within SIs (both large and small ones) know so much more about the technologies and how to use them than someone sitting in Stamford, CT or Cambridge, MA. Some day, the market will tell the emperor to get dressed -- or abdicate the throne. In the meantime, I'm content with being a valuable fish in a smaller pond.

BTW ... I think sales people are a necessary evil in this world. Until last week, Spend Matters / MetalMiner had about a 4-1.5 ratio (FT writers/analysts to FT sales equivalents). Now we're 5-1.5 with the addition of a new editor.
# Posted By Jason Busch | 3/19/10 5:50 AM
Kevin Brooks's Gravatar Sorry to see Andrew go, especially when valid second opinions to the ever-growing Gartner/AMR juggernaut in the sourcing/procurement space are scarce. However, I am encouraged by some of the operational improvements Aberdeen has made since the Harte-Hanks buyout and I look forward to the ideas and perspectives sure to come from the next generation of analysts coming up through the ranks.

See you all in Chicago!
# Posted By Kevin Brooks | 3/19/10 7:09 AM
About Us | Advertising and Sponsorships | Advisory Services | Contact Us    © 2004-2012 Azul Partners, Inc. and Spend Matters. All Rights Reserved.