The Healthcare Supply Chain: Healthcare Reform and the Laws of Supply and Demand
According to Dr. Cecil Wilson, President of the American Medical Association, Medicare currently only covers about half the cost of running a physician practice. A recent survey of physician practices reported that two in three physicians planned to limit or stop seeing new Medicare patients. The pending issue could have a chilling effect on the wellness focus of the healthcare reform bill for senior citizens because the physician is a key player in wellness care. If this cut goes through physicians will become heavily dependent on private insurance to meet their financial requirements. If that goes away, as those in favor of single payer would like, it will likely mean that fewer people will have access to relatively inexpensive in office care and more people will be showing up at hospital emergency rooms, just the opposite of what we are told is supposed to happen. This is actually happening already. Medicare reduced the amount it pays physicians to provide in office chemotherapy. As a result, more physicians are trying to have their chemo patients treated in the hospital, where reimbursement is no better.
In procurement we know that if the supply of an item goes down (doctors leaving Medicare) and demand goes up (aging Baby Boomers flood the Medicare program) one of two things will happen, and neither is good. Either costs will go up (government paying more to lure doctors back into the program) or there will be reduced access (more patients trying to access services from fewer physicians resulting in de facto rationing [versus system based rationing]).
None of this is to suggest that some form of health care reform is not needed. But in the midst of a recession an incremental approach would have been far wiser, starting with catastrophic coverage that would have picked up after lifetime maximums were reached through traditional insurance. Once we understood the real cost of that, we could have continued step by step to reach the point where no citizen would ever have to worry about losing everything as a result of healthcare costs.
TweetBacks






























However, if you want to use scare tactics and simplistic arguements instead of honestly debating the issue, what would make you think that Medicare would pay to get doc's back into Medicare? It's the stickier side of that law of supply and demand...there's only so much demand below the 65yo mark...Pediatricians OB/GYN's maybe, but if you're a Urologist or Cardiologist you aren't going to get a 65yo retiree to pay your fees out of pocket your patient base is pretty limited if you don't take Medicare. Honestly, your proposition that Medicare would pay big $$ to lure doc's back is a virtual impossibility. I would love to see the true market impact of 2/3 doc's refusing Medicare. Honestly, what would happen? My guess is that it wouldn't happen and if it did, fees would have to go down to at least as far as Medicare has planned in order to make it affordable for private pay patients.
As sarcastic as I sound, I am truly sympathetic to this issue, particularly when it comes to primary care doc's. I just wish this Tea Party scare tactic that has become popular lately would just go away. Let's debate the issues and come to a solution...really.