spendmatters
 

May 20, 2012

 

The Healthcare Supply Chain: Healthcare Reform and the Laws of Supply and Demand

Six months after the passage of healthcare reform the proverbial pendulum still swings over the head of physicians who treat Medicare patients. A payment cut of 23.6% is scheduled to take effect on December 1 unless Congress acts to once again delay its implementation. But on January 1, 2011 an additional 6.5% cut is scheduled to take effect. Readers will recall that many years ago Congress passed a cut but then every year (or every several months, as in the case of this year), have kicked the can down the road hoping it would become someone else's problem. The issue is particularly interesting this year because paying for healthcare reform means $500 billion in Medicare cuts over ten years and physicians face their share.

According to Dr. Cecil Wilson, President of the American Medical Association, Medicare currently only covers about half the cost of running a physician practice. A recent survey of physician practices reported that two in three physicians planned to limit or stop seeing new Medicare patients. The pending issue could have a chilling effect on the wellness focus of the healthcare reform bill for senior citizens because the physician is a key player in wellness care. If this cut goes through physicians will become heavily dependent on private insurance to meet their financial requirements. If that goes away, as those in favor of single payer would like, it will likely mean that fewer people will have access to relatively inexpensive in office care and more people will be showing up at hospital emergency rooms, just the opposite of what we are told is supposed to happen. This is actually happening already. Medicare reduced the amount it pays physicians to provide in office chemotherapy. As a result, more physicians are trying to have their chemo patients treated in the hospital, where reimbursement is no better.

In procurement we know that if the supply of an item goes down (doctors leaving Medicare) and demand goes up (aging Baby Boomers flood the Medicare program) one of two things will happen, and neither is good. Either costs will go up (government paying more to lure doctors back into the program) or there will be reduced access (more patients trying to access services from fewer physicians resulting in de facto rationing [versus system based rationing]).

None of this is to suggest that some form of health care reform is not needed. But in the midst of a recession an incremental approach would have been far wiser, starting with catastrophic coverage that would have picked up after lifetime maximums were reached through traditional insurance. Once we understood the real cost of that, we could have continued step by step to reach the point where no citizen would ever have to worry about losing everything as a result of healthcare costs.

- Lynn James Everard


TweetBacks
Comments
kb's Gravatar Personally, I think that this is a complex issue and it begins with Medical Education and goes on and on and on...

However, if you want to use scare tactics and simplistic arguements instead of honestly debating the issue, what would make you think that Medicare would pay to get doc's back into Medicare? It's the stickier side of that law of supply and demand...there's only so much demand below the 65yo mark...Pediatricians OB/GYN's maybe, but if you're a Urologist or Cardiologist you aren't going to get a 65yo retiree to pay your fees out of pocket your patient base is pretty limited if you don't take Medicare. Honestly, your proposition that Medicare would pay big $$ to lure doc's back is a virtual impossibility. I would love to see the true market impact of 2/3 doc's refusing Medicare. Honestly, what would happen? My guess is that it wouldn't happen and if it did, fees would have to go down to at least as far as Medicare has planned in order to make it affordable for private pay patients.

As sarcastic as I sound, I am truly sympathetic to this issue, particularly when it comes to primary care doc's. I just wish this Tea Party scare tactic that has become popular lately would just go away. Let's debate the issues and come to a solution...really.
# Posted By kb | 11/9/10 8:31 PM
Lynn Everard's Gravatar I agree that this is a complex issue. I have spent most of my career working in the various sectors that comprise the delivery of health care services in this country. One of my biggest concerns about the health care reform bill is that it was hastily put together and could not possibly have taken those complexities into account. Clearly the government is able to legislate coverage but legislating access to health care services is something completely different. Health care service providers are faced with increasing regulation and cost of doing business combined with lower reimbursement. This could create an environment in which more errors take place but since the bill completely fails to address malpractice issues more providers of care can expect more lawsuits and higher costs of doing business. As it is hospitals are having to spend millions to implement EHR by 2014 just to be allowed to stay in the Medicare program all the while having to deal with their share of an annual $50 billion reduction in Medicare payments. Call this Tea Party talking points if you must (ironic because I have nothing to do with the Tea Party and have never even been to one of their web sites) but it would be much more constructive if we could just discuss the issues apart from attempts to label one another.
# Posted By Lynn Everard | 11/9/10 9:39 PM
Mike's Gravatar With the sweaping change in House and nearly the Senate. It appears from www.BenefitsManager.net analysis that employers nationwide wide that GRANDFATHERED their health plan stand a better chance to weather whatever the Republicans can repeal in employer burden with health care reform. It is still likely that employers will still incure a penalty for every full time employee that refuses coverage. The penalty being $2,000. If you can GRANDFATHER your renewals this January you should do so to protect your backside.
# Posted By Mike | 11/10/10 12:06 PM
About Us | Advertising and Sponsorships | Advisory Services | Contact Us    © 2004-2012 Azul Partners, Inc. and Spend Matters. All Rights Reserved.