spendmatters
 

May 16, 2012

 

Supplierforce Enters Voluntary Liquidation -- Background and Implications

Supplierforce, a Dublin-based supplier information management provider, has entered voluntary liquidation. You can read past coverage of Supplierforce on Spend Matters here, here, here and here (it should also be noted in full disclosure that Supplierforce is an Associate Sponsor of Spend Matters UK/Europe). Spend Matters had the chance to speak with Supplierforce's founder and CEO Declan Kearney about the liquidation filing on Monday afternoon. He shared with Spend Matters that the funding of Supplierforce "has been impacted by the economic issues of the past year". As a result of this situation, the company has gone into voluntary liquidation, a process in Ireland which "enables the appointed liquidator to realise value, on behalf of creditors and shareholders, through the sale of the assets," according to Declan.

This leaves Supplierforce in a situation where "the liquidator will now sell the business as a going concern, that sale to include the Intellectual Property of the business and customer base". Declan told Spend Matters that "there is strong commitment to the business from stakeholders (staff, creditors and shareholders)" and that "a number of parties have expressed strong interest in acquiring the business" over a process which will take 3 to 4 weeks to complete. Other interested parties should reach out to Supplierforce immediately to be included in the process.

What does the future hold for Supplierforce? Declan suggested to Spend Matters that "the recent process has enabled the business to review its strategy" and that "under new ownership and investment (with a focus on marketing, sales and technology), the business will be capable of focusing on its key strengths: Supplier Information Management, Performance and Risk Management" and "a fully integrated approach with strong capabilities in Sourcing and Contract Management".

Spend Matters is not familiar enough with the regional Irish procurement market to comment on market conditions and user adoption relative to the rest of the EU, but our own research suggests that Supplierforce was ahead of its time in Europe in pursuing the supplier information management market. However, in contrast to Xcitec, which has developed a strong capability and reputation in supplier management software through penetration in the German market, Supplierforce never developed enough critical mass and profitable adoption of its software tools. It also pursued a hybrid services/software model at one point in recent years that might have played a role in directing company focus away from exclusively growing software revenue.

Spend Matters believes that these challenges contributed to Supplierforce's business shortfall but ultimately, the primary cause of the filing was due to the firm being caught up in an investment climate and funding environment in the Irish market that has been more challenging than most owing to the financial crisis in the region. Still, companies considering investments in other supplier information management technology from best of breed vendors (e.g., AECSoft, Aravo, Biznet, CVM Solutions, Hiperos, Rollstream) should conduct financial due diligence on their potential vendors in the wake of Supplierforce's filing, as the voluntary liquidation represents a single -- if inconclusive -- data point suggestive of the continuing need for this market to prove long-term, stand-alone viability (which it has not yet done).

Spend Matters believes the winners in Supplierforce's demise are providers such as Achilles, Ariba, D&B, Emptoris, Oracle and SAP, all of which offer supplier information management / supply base management capabilities and the customer perception of greater stability through size and diversification of revenue. However, potential and existing supplier information management customers of the smaller, best of breed vendors listed above -- not to mention others also competing in this market -- should note that at least a subset of the providers maintain solid balance sheets and are realizing profitable growth.

Spend Matters will continue to cover the outcome of Supplierforce's voluntary liquidation filing in the coming weeks.

- Jason Busch


TweetBacks
Comments
Unconvinced's Gravatar As another blogger in this space has pointed out (albeit somewhat tongue-in-cheek), a competitive SIM application could be built by an intelligent, well-guided high-school student using Microsoft Access. Of course that is not a realistic solution, but his point is telling. Because whenever the technical barrier to entry for a point solution is low, the point solution's market can easily be taken away over time by a larger, better-diversified competitor. Often (in the business software arena) this is an ERP player, but in the procurement space it could equally well be one of the larger esourcing/eprocurement providers.

Whether this particular bankruptcy is indicative of anything or not (my guess is "not"), point-source vendors with "hey, let's build (yet another) web-based database forms application with some custom reports" type solutions should be deeply wary of the monsters lurking in the shadows.
# Posted By Unconvinced | 11/30/10 7:59 AM
Jason Busch's Gravatar You could also build basic CRM in access as well (and why not put on a Sharepoint front-end for collaboration). Yet few have done that. A number of current SIM products are quite basic, but when you get into data integration, workflow engines (including branching structures), third-party content feeds and integration, alerting, advanced dashboarding / visualization, full process integration into transactional purchasing systems, integration into sourcing/spend/performance systems, community/TP management, etc. it gets complicated quickly. I would encourage you to really look at the architectures of what some of the leaders in the space have built. They might not beat the big guys in the end, but SIM is bigger and much, much more complicated than it first appears.
# Posted By Jason Busch | 11/30/10 11:21 AM
Another Take's Gravatar Agree it's not a technology problem. I'd say it's more that "SIM" is not a product category. Perhaps it's a little feature of a larger application space, but the real problem is in the distribution side. The question is better stated as "Who cares about SIM and can you get enough people to pay you for it"? SIM seems primarily to be a concern as you get to larger entities (duh), so that limits the market size. And when you do talk to larger entities, can you get 2 things: 1, them to pay sizable monies and 2, a consistent solution that doesn't require complete customization. My guess is that SIM will never become its own space like eprocurement, sourcing, etc.
# Posted By Another Take | 12/1/10 10:33 AM
Spend Enabler's Gravatar I truly believe that SIM is a commodity at this point and a not reallly a software category. The broader players will have it licked as part of a bigger offering. The really value add for companies like these in my mind is in broader Supplier Managament and Customer Management (Risk, Compliance, Performance, Relationship Management, Supplier / Business Development). This combined with data assets that eliminate the need (in some cases) for highly manual rigorous internal Procurement/Business processes is a huge win for organizations. Eventually could lead to improved predictive modeling for key areas like risk.

As things progress customers will be more willing to pay for value added data/services not a system that can collect information. I think we will soon be entering the age of Enterprise Software 2.0 = free.

SIM should be a core add-on to any ERP / Spend Management application that does not cost extra. If it is stand-alone then it needs to offer much much more than just managing data collection.
# Posted By Spend Enabler | 12/2/10 1:48 PM
Liquidation's Gravatar by undergoing Liquidation its not going to foreclosure. Just to ensure that there is still a good chance business service provider can help solve it.
# Posted By Liquidation | 3/8/11 5:40 AM
About Us | Advertising and Sponsorships | Advisory Services | Contact Us    © 2004-2012 Azul Partners, Inc. and Spend Matters. All Rights Reserved.