spend matters spend matters About this site
Advertise with Spend Matters
Advertise with Spend Matters
 

March 19, 2010

 

Wanted: President Obama's Spend Management Plan

Dear President Obama,

As spend management advisors and taxpayers, we were highly encouraged by your commitment to make federal procurement reform a top priority for your administration. Your acknowledgement that "the [federal] procurement system right now doesn't work," impressed us. We applauded your call for more diligent oversight of large federal contracts, which, in your estimation, were showing "cost overruns of 30 percent or 40 percent or 50%, and then still don't perform the way they're supposed to". And when you claimed your team had already "identified potentially $40 billion in savings just by some of the procurement reforms that are pretty apparent to a lot ... And we are going to continue to find savings," we held out hope that your spend management discipline would help fund (and offset) a chunk of the economic stimulus package.

Yet, our optimism is waning. Nearly five months after you announced your procurement reform plans, only one of the top federal procurement seats have been filled -- and that's at the Defense Department, where budget is declining. Leadership seats at the other two major federal procurement groups -- the Office of Federal Procurement Policy (OFPP) and the General Services Administration (GSA) -- remain unfilled.



Now in your defense, Martha Johnson, your GSA nominee, is held up in the Senate. But given that this is not a highly controversial nomination and the Democratic Party controls the Senate, her approval should not take 4 months. The OFPP on the other hand, does not even have a nominee and it has been reported that it may take another two months for your administration to put a name forward. Why the delay when these critical agencies control such large budgets?

Collectively, these two agencies oversee more than $375 billion in spending on external goods and services annually. They also set the government's policies for sourcing, contracting, and governance of supplier agreements. Driving the types of procurement policy and governance reforms you call for is tough enough. Doing so in today's uncertain economic environment is even more challenging. And attempting it without an experienced captain at the helm is downright dangerous.

In these tight economic times, commercial enterprises have made spend management a top priority in order to maintain profits. And taxpayers are tightening their belts at home to just pay the bills -- let alone save for the future. As the watchdogs of our tax dollars -- and increasingly our economy -- it is only prudent that the federal government apply the same fiscal discipline to its own spending.

Moreover, it's time to call the public's attention to the billions of dollars in savings your Presidential tenure could bring us. But Washington is currently making hay over pennies (e.g., $2 million in savings from changing Coast Guard maintenance schedules) vs. targeting the bigger picture. In procurement, we like to say it's important to focus on the 20% of the things that will bring 80% of the returns (this is the classic Pareto principle). Pinning this message to your staffer's walls would go a long way to driving home a plan to focus everyone's attention on the types of initiatives necessary to get significantly more in return for every dollar of Federal spending.

We think that we'd all agree that the type of oversight and direction needed for federal agencies to spend tax dollars more wisely requires strong leadership. Until such leadership is posted at the OFPP and GSA, the chances of the type of federal procurement reform and spend management discipline you propose -- and this nation requires -- will be more hope than reality.

We strongly encourage your administration to waste no more time. Appoint federal procurement leadership now. Focus the nation on the massive savings opportunities that are possible to create excitement. And get on with the business of spend management reform and economic recovery.

Respectfully,

Tim A. Minahan, CMO Ariba, Inc.

Jason Busch, Founder & Editor Spend Matters

Justin Fogarty, Editor Supply Excellence

- Jason Busch

Comments
Good collaboration with Supply Excellence. I would like to see more of this, but not as much in which the line of thinking becomes the same.
# Posted By Carlos Ortiz | 8/3/09 12:23 PM
Well said Gentlemen!

One silver lining is the memo issued last week by Peter Orszag of the OMB who has instructed a 7% savings target for 2011 and also some other guidelines regarding reducing non-competitive bidding by 10%, mothballing spend for useless projects, and other good ideas (best practice adoptions, technology, etc.).

http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/assets/memoranda_fy2...

It also mentioned upskilling the staff to accomplish this, and this will certainly be critical, but just issuing the directive will only go so far - this isn't the first sourcing directive. We work with many of the agencies, and it will also require many other supporting activities regarding cross-agency collaboration, better GSA integration, improved performance measurement (like rewarding intelligent budget reductions and not punishing staff who don't spend all their budgets), improving pay-for-performance, and a host of other needed steps.

Still, it's a step in the right direction, and coupled with the appointments you mentioned, we'll start to see some improved ROI on how our tax dollars are spent.
# Posted By Pierre Mitchell | 8/3/09 1:10 PM
Gentlemen,

Could not agree with the need to act fast. Lets help our government help us. Here's Coupa's ante:

http://www.coupa.com/six-months-to-smarter-spendin...

http://pitch.pe/20664

Best,
Rob Bernshteyn
Coupa Software CEO
# Posted By Rob Bernshteyn | 8/5/09 1:23 PM
About Us | Advertising and Sponsorships | Advisory Services | Contact Us   © 2004-2010 Spend Matters, LP All rights reserved