spendmatters
 

February 09, 2012

 

Would You Buy Supply Chain Consulting Services from Your Largest Product Suppliers?

Not so long ago, there was a number of thriving independent hospital supply chain consultancies. Then something interesting started to happen. The largest of those consultancies were acquired -- one by one -- by some of the industry's largest manufacturers. Not to be left out, the industry's group purchasing organizations and distributors got into the action by either buying other consultancies or starting their own. But how would hospital C-suite dwellers respond to what seemed like an obvious conflict of interest? They welcomed these new arrangements with open arms especially when they realized that these new supplier consultancies could offer them services at little or no apparent cost.

At virtually every turn they were able to undercut the pricing of the few remaining independent consultants who did not have supply contract profits from their clients to use to offset the financial impact of lower consulting fees. Years later, some of those consultancies were sold back to private owners but they were no match for the remaining supplier in-house supply chain consultancies. Today it is getting harder for hospitals to get unbiased supply chain advice and harder to find hospitals that are willing to pay for it anyway.

So what do you think? How comfortable would you be buying supply chain consulting services from your largest product suppliers? Do you think they would give you advice that reduced their sales to your organization even if that would be best for your company?

Is your organization or someone you know looking for a procurement leader or consultant with a deep understanding of the health care industry? If so, please send an email to: leverard@bellsouth. net.

- Lynn James Everard


Commodity Edge Conference

TweetBacks
Comments
Anony_ConsultantHere's Gravatar I don't know if I would agree with the undercutting independent firms, I run a long term firm and have been clearly almost half of what GPO consultancy charge and maybe a tenth of what the big boys charge and I give higher ROI's and save more overall as well.

I would agree that hospitals take the easy relationship trust and go with the GPO consultancy firms and the GPOs and the Vendor firms have the captive audience because they are there dealing with them on the day to day products and services that they provide anyway.

Would a GPO Consultant go against any of their contracts in the name of better value for their hospital client? Doubt it

Would a Vendor Rep tell a hospital that their product is substandard or causing cost overruns? Oh Course they Would (Tongue in Cheek)
# Posted By Anony_ConsultantHere | 8/21/09 7:40 AM
Greg Thome's Gravatar As an aquiree in one of the first of those industry acquisitions, you hit it squarely. The mfrs and distributors sell or provide as "value-add" but truly don't value it. The GPO's have significant conflict of interest issues but members expect to source such services from them. The opportunities are many so whoever provides the service looks good. The core issue is purchasing/materiel management/supply chain local responsibilities have been significantly diluted which has impacted skill sets. More over the supplier competitive environment is narrow. But there is a lot of fun to be had.
# Posted By Greg Thome | 8/23/09 8:58 PM
supply chain consultants's Gravatar Well,I am dealing with a supply chain consultancy firm Exalt Group. And I am extremely satisfied with the results.
# Posted By supply chain consultants | 9/23/09 5:11 AM
About Us | Advertising and Sponsorships | Advisory Services | Contact Us    © 2004-2012 Azul Partners, Inc. and Spend Matters. All Rights Reserved.