Health Care and the Supply Chain (Part 3): Maybe John Kerry was Right
In and of itself, passing legislation fixes nothing in the same way that simply signing a new procurement contract saves no money. Money is saved in procurement by effectively using the contract to insure that lower prices are paid. I once followed a person in a procurement job who announced savings when he signed a contract but then never followed through on the details to be sure the savings were actually achieved.
If the President and Congress are serious about improving health care there are intermediate steps that can be taken apart from monstrous legislation that no one understands. One of them is the creation of a catastrophic health care cost safety net as proposed by Senator John Kerry in his 2004 campaign for President. According to the June 4, 2009 issue of Business Week, Harvard researchers reported that 62% percent of all personal bankruptcies in 2007 were caused by health problems and that 78% of those filers had health insurance.
The fact is that health insurance plans have lifetime maximum caps and once the insurance company pays out an amount equal to the cap they are done paying. Some diseases and health conditions are incredibly expensive and will exhaust an insured's benefits. When that happens today, even if Medicare is involved, it will still leave a growing balance that is the responsibility of the patient and the patient's family.
Senator Kerry maintained that no one should have to go bankrupt over health care costs. This could be achieved if the government were to create a Catastrophic Cost Safety Net that stepped in and covered one hundred percent of health care costs once an insured's lifetime maximum was exhausted. There are obviously many details that would have to be explored but surely it would be a place to start before we just guess at what will fix health care.
















As for Obama saying the stimulus worked, he's said nothing of the sort. He continually reminds us of the challenges we face and that very little of the stimulus money has actually gotten into the economy. I do agree he should do more about the deficit though. First thing being repealing the $1.3 trillion of Bush tax cuts which is almost double the stimulus and the exact money the rich "invested" into these ponzi schemes that sent the economy crashing down.
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/07/06/opinion/06krugma...
Thanks for your comments. Regarding technology and e-procurement, which is what I think you meant, the turn of the century saw over 100 e-procurement platforms fighting for survival yet now barely a handful exist. The largest is owned by the largest manufacturers and and the two largest GPOs. Although they were originally intended to create a competitive marketplace for hospital purchasing they quickly became transaction focused rather than savings focused. The few independent third parties entrants who were focused on lowering costs were relegated to also ran status when they could not find truly independent investors.
I am not convinced that we need government run health care but we sure do need a whole lot more oversight than we have now and we need clear rules and a way to enforce those rules. I believe in free markets but not in markets where the players are free to break the rules or make up their own with impunity.
http://www.nur-unr.be/R-Bay_leaflet_v111.pdf