spend matters spend matters About this site
Advertise with Spend Matters
Advertise with Spend Matters
 

March 12, 2010

 

Airbus Crashes Hard -- Is There a Spare Parts Connection?

There is a certain arrogance to suppliers in the A&D market (similar to the arrogance of those in the automotive industry). If you can meet A&D customer expectations (e.g., tight tolerances, just-in-time programs, quality, etc.), you can meet them in any industry. Automotive suppliers often claim to sit on a similar pedestal, suggesting that if you can serve auto OEMs (e.g., sailing through the PPAP process) you can serve just about any industry. There's some truth to both statements (and ironically, there's also often overlap lower down in the tiers in the A&D and automotive supply base). But given these types of fighting words, you'd think we'd be less likely to see crashes and failures relating in some way (at least potentially) to the supply chain. Guess again.



The A&D supply chain should, in theory, be one of the most regulated in the market. But when it comes to planes that have been put into service, it's difficult to track and monitor all of the spare parts that make it onto commercial and military aircraft -- despite all of the work that qualified suppliers go through. The magnitude of the problem is frightening. An article in Aerospace Manufacturing and Design recently noted that "According to an FAA estimate, about 520,000 counterfeit or unapproved parts are currently making it into planes annually, which is about 2% of the overall 26 million active parts. While 2% may seem like a small number, consider that a typical passenger aircraft contains up to 6 million parts, and consider the extreme tolerances for failure to which each part must adhere."

Industry insiders I've spoken with suggest that the counterfeit problem is even more acute in the case of smaller worldwide carriers where non-approved items may more easily find their way onto aircraft (either unintentionally or not). Might counterfeit parts have played a roll in the recent Air France and Yemeni Airbus crashes? Perhaps, but most likely in the latter case if at all (although general red maintenance flags have already been raised by the EU).

More important in the broader industry is that as increasing amounts of production shift to developing markets for both production and spare parts, it's likely the counterfeiting problem will remain and potentially increase. When it comes to China, in particular, we must all posit the question: can we really trust a regional supply base that has proven such little respect for intellectual property in other industries to apply different standards to A&D? It's unlikely, which makes this previous announcement from Boeing scary indeed.

One of the solutions is for procurement and supply chain organizations within A&D to apply as much diligence to monitoring the service parts environment as the production one. Ultimately, even though replacement and maintenance decisions, monitoring and traceability rest with the carriers, OEMs and component suppliers will pay the ultimate brand-damaging price if counterfeit or unapproved parts end up in anyway becoming a contributing factor to the recent -- or future -- tragedies.

- Jason Busch

Comments
I'm an old fart, so it was a long time ago when I got my MBA. But, back in the dark ages they taught us a simple lesson ... follow the money. I still hope that lesson is being taught today.

Having been in the supply chain business supporting parts procurement for Nuclear Power and Space Shuttle applications (as well as aviation and automotive), I understand the role of the supply chain manager in ensuring quality parts are what you buy and that you have objective evidence of what is delivered. I have also participated in putting several folks in jail for providing counterfeit parts and can tell you getting them out of your supply chain once they are delivered is challenging and expensive.

My point – whenever I have a done a root cause analysis of why the system failed, it inevitably went back to a sourcing person under pressure to reduce costs. Just as I would not want the CFO flying the plane I was riding in, I get nervous whenever the sourcing decision is driven more by the accounting and finance team than the engineers and production staff.
# Posted By Greg | 7/1/09 6:58 AM
Airbus is the only airplane manufacturer that went with lead free solder connections (under the EU RoHS directive) despite being outside the scope of the directive.
Lead free solder connections are prone for whisker growth, voiding and less reliable brittle solder connections.

Unfortunatly the general public is not aware of this!!
# Posted By Patrick Bruneel | 7/1/09 7:42 AM
About Us | Advertising and Sponsorships | Advisory Services | Contact Us   © 2004-2010 Spend Matters, LP All rights reserved