spendmatters
 

February 09, 2012

 

Friday Rant: What's to Come for Ariba?

Anyone who says they can predict the future should be tarred, feathered and forced to use one of the earlier versions of ORMS to requisition their own tombstone. But I'm not here to predict the future -- only to cast my prognostications about it in this quick rant. And in regards to Ariba, when I peer into my Spend Management crystal ball, I see three things based on my recent interactions, product analyses, customer discussions and channel checks. Down and dirty, here they are.



First, Ariba's solutions are in the process of emerging from a massive transition. Anyone who thinks they know them and who is not familiar with the new direction, capabilities and differentiation should take a seat in the corner. I'm suitably impressed in this regard and see big things for Ariba in regards to customer traction and product innovation in the coming year. This is not the Ariba we all knew 12 months ago. Or even 6 months ago for that matter.

Second, Ariba continues to alienate VARs and channel partners, doing little to successfully create an ecosystem that endears resellers or integrators to them. Sometimes it's better to be the US than the UN, but if they're going to go it alone, why not make the case outright and stop with the false starts. Here, my prediction is that Ariba will miss out on channel opportunities when their partner ecosystem looks to other providers where they can make more money (and with providers who really want to work with them). Ariba's biggest mistake in the past 12 months in this regard has been a failure to build the VAR model successfully for its SaaS solutions (according to VAR partners I've spoken with). I estimate that <10% of SaaS deals have come through a channel.

My last prediction for Ariba -- and many have been saying this for years -- is that they fail to remain independent before the clock strikes January 1, 2011. There's simply too valuable an asset here waiting for someone to unlock as traditional enterprise software models stumble and ERP upgrade cycles flounder. Who will it be? I'm not sure. But I'd bet with greater than 60% probability on a buyout in the next 18 months.

- Jason Busch


Commodity Edge Conference

TweetBacks
Comments
Anonymous's Gravatar I couldn't agree more with your assessment of Ariba's alienation of partners. They are really missing the boat, and therefore, many opportunities. Anyone who has partnered (or tried to partner) with Ariba knows that it's a one way street - you give, they take.

I'll wait to see if your prediction of a buy-out happens... I've been predicting the same since 2000. But the timing may be right now. The only hope is that someone who knows how to partner with VAR's and channel partners is the lucky buyer.
# Posted By Anonymous | 6/19/09 6:52 AM
Fortune100CPO's Gravatar I think one of the biggest challenges for Ariba is to satisfy the legacy customers. The most common line used by the used car salesman is "Ariba is used by 50% of the Fortune 100." Well, every single one of these customers is running the CD version of Ariba for P2P (installed or hosted).

If I'm the CPO of one of these customers, I'm very concerned about the future direction of Ariba, as I'm 100% sure that our business requirements won't be satisfied in the OnDemand solution.

It certainly feels like Ariba has abandoned the customers who put Ariba on the map. Ariba is forcing these customers to aggressively establish Plan B, which does not include Ariba.
# Posted By Fortune100CPO | 6/19/09 8:29 AM
Jason Busch's Gravatar The last point is fair, as Ariba has downplayed its installed future. And the characteristics of the On Demand solution make it more appealing for companies without the most complicated global footprints and backends. However, since "Plan Bs" including ERP migrations are often getting pushed out because IT upgrade schedules are facing delays, Ariba has bought some time in certain situations. Still, point taken -- Ariba should not abandon its behind-the-firewall large organization installed base, many of whom are not overly interested in upgrading (but are investigating other options).
# Posted By Jason Busch | 6/19/09 8:41 AM
SpendEnabler's Gravatar It has been my experience that Ariba just can't get out of their own way. Generally speaking they are short-sighted when it comes to interactions they have with their customers. In my opinion they need spend management experts on the front lines with customers / prospects rather than traditional ERP like software sales reps who add no value. They also need to understand the different procurement organizational models and adapt their approach to customer engagement based on this. A lot more innovation from customers would happen if they did this, they'd end up selling more in the long run and they would get a lot more renewals. This is where I think the VAR's can help and it is a huge missed opportunity. Instead many folks are tired of their cutthroat sales approach and ready to move on to other players in the market including marquee legacy customers.

"The saddest thing in life is wasted talent"
# Posted By SpendEnabler | 6/19/09 2:32 PM
In a Quandary's Gravatar We are debating Ariba On Demand vs. CD version due to more flexibility with the CD version. Contract Management especially is driving this decision for the CD version. We've heard that the On Demand version of CM is really limiting for configurability.

Does anyone have any experience dealing with CD and On Demand versions? Any recommendations?
# Posted By In a Quandary | 6/23/09 9:35 AM
Vince's Gravatar As far as I know the On Demand version is always ahead in terms of functionality, as CD is on a longer release schedule. Configurability should be comparable, but customization is only possible in the CD version. This comes down to a discussion of best practice vs. bespoke processes. The latter comes at a cost, not just in implementation but also future maintenance, and very often doesn't add much business value. You may be better off going through a level of process reengineering than customizing an off the shelf software package.
# Posted By Vince | 6/24/09 6:30 AM
About Us | Advertising and Sponsorships | Advisory Services | Contact Us    © 2004-2012 Azul Partners, Inc. and Spend Matters. All Rights Reserved.