spendmatters
 

February 09, 2012

 

Friday Rant: Re-thinking Company Loyalty -- and vice-versa

We're bombarded everyday with news about massive layoffs and increasing un-employment. Some take the schadenfreude position of "thank God it wasn't me" and feel a certain pleasure in having avoided the axe. Others, hopefully, perpetually assess their value to the company they work for, think and act proactively and constantly look for new and better ways to hedge the economic climate.

The personal trauma of this climate hit home for me last week upon hearing that just such a person as the latter -- an old friend who went to work for a national paper merchant straight from college -- was laid off after 33 years of extremely loyal performance. Ed (not his real name) was a middle management poster boy for this merchant house. He always rolled with the punches. As regional purchasing director, inventory manager, inventory analyst and IT wonk, Ed mentored well over half of the staff that remains on board. This man was the most up-beat, committed and can-do person I've ever met. He was unceremoniously dismissed without notice and a meager severance package. Ed's position was not eliminated, he was replaced by a young grad at half his salary.



Like many 50 something's in the work force, Ed's pension was virtually trashed a few years back when the merchant house was taken over by an international consulting firm, and his 401K lost 50% of its value in the past year. Now we can say that perhaps he shouldn't have stayed so long. But his dilemma is a raw example of an impending problem that we all need to think long and hard about.

It has been forecast that Ed's generation, the 50's baby boomers, will need to work well past the age of 65 in order to afford a minimally comfortable retirement. It's also safe to say that this will hold true for everyone else in the U.S. workforce. In our current economic climate and the changing paradigm it will inevitably engender, what are we going to do with an increasingly aging middle management workforce that can be displaced at half their accumulated salaries and for whom replacement positions are becoming increasingly scarce? Not to mention how we will sustain and nurture commitment, creativity -- and yes, loyalty -- throughout the employment life cycle.

- William Busch, Spend Matters Columnist


Commodity Edge Conference

TweetBacks
Comments
Eric Strovink's Gravatar What tends to happen is that the skills acquired by long-term employees are not well understood by company management, especially after an acquisition or multiple-acquisition scenario, and/or when there is upper-level management turnover. Inevitably, long-term and higher-paid employees are terminated in favor of younger, less expensive employees, based on an insufficient understanding of the job that was actually being done by the long-term employee (in many cases, a job well beyond the "paper" description of same).

The resultant tree has foliage and roots, but the trunk itself is rotten, and can't withstand any pressure.

It's therefore not surprising to see many companies who have created mid-level rot turning to outside consultancies to help them remember how to perform the job functions they've eliminated. There are lots of folks like "Ed" who have landed very nice consulting gigs, stepping in at 2x to 3x their previous salary to do exactly the same job they once did -- with plenty of time left over for walks on the beach (as the phone rings desperately).
# Posted By Eric Strovink | 4/10/09 11:15 AM
l.k. humeumtewa's Gravatar Let's just hope Eric is correct (happy ever after as a consultant.) I wonder about the sustainability of *that* model too. Jason, thanks for surfacing what I believe is going to one of the significant worlforce issues for the next two decades. And as a 50-something who expects to keep working for another 20 years but also the parent of a kid who will be entering the workforce in a few years, it's definitely something to lose sleep over.

It's really many issues. Eric brings up the complex knowledge set that seasoned employees have. There are many of our generation who have not kept their skills sharp, who rely on their wiles and growing experience to make it through the workweek. But I beileve that there are also many of us who have bought into the continuous improvement philosophy and are current AND seasoned. Unfortunately, sometimes it's more a tradeoff of the best person at XXXX dollars vs someone who is clearly not the perfect person, but is viewed as "good enough" and will do the job for XX dollars.
# Posted By l.k. humeumtewa | 4/10/09 12:41 PM
Chris Arlen's Gravatar I too am a 50+ boomer, but became consultanized 13 years ago. I quickly found it to be my preferred work style. Not always easy, but definitely my path.

With that said, the casual termination of knowledge workers for lower cost versions seems to be done by firms that commoditize human assets. Those actions are signaled within an org by top execs who lack leadership and an ethical responsibility beyond the bottom line.

Unfortunately, that's the way of our species. There's a small population who will do anything to acquire power - and who disregard responsibilities (or present a false face) to others in their org.

And Ed ended up in a bad situation at a time when the traditional employer/employee understanding had been gone for a long time. He's been in a legacy relationship with his company, that's just now been modernized. Painful.
# Posted By Chris Arlen | 4/10/09 4:36 PM
Pearl's Gravatar What is somewhat (or blatantly) ironic about this post is Jason would be saying the old dude got what he deserved. Since the 24 year old Indian dude could do the same job for half the cost. That's progress! Actually he is far too smart to say that out loud, but if a manufacturer can cut his costs in half by sourcing from China he is all for it. So why is getting rid of the old expensive guy a problem? Things that make you say hrmm.....

As a 40+ something I appreciate the problem. I can't say that I ever worked in the same place for 33 years though. Or even 6 years. That's just not the way the country is designed anymore. I wish it was.

But more curiously...did you just say that a consulting firm bought a paper manufacturing company? That doesn't even sound within the realm of possibility. Did I read that wrong?
# Posted By Pearl | 4/11/09 8:28 PM
William Busch's Gravatar Pearl,

Bain

Thanks for asking.
# Posted By William Busch | 4/12/09 7:06 AM
Phil Fersht's Gravatar Call center work is one option. For starters, who could hang the phone up on a nice grandma trying to sell you a pension plan? A lot harder than some kid reading off a script...

One big plus about the older generation is that they respect a job for an honest days' work. I'm more concerend for the spolied 30-40-somethings used to being overpaid for doing an average job, and haven't been trained in anything of significant value for years. Do they have the mentality to do "real" jobs that don't pay that well, but require a good attitude?
# Posted By Phil Fersht | 4/13/09 5:23 AM
Neil Glenney's Gravatar This scenario has been happening for so many years now and will continue for as long as management decision makers view employees and an expense vs. a valuable asset.
But, today there is a solution for the American Worker to strongly consider as an alternative to this inevitable employment acceptable practice - entrepreneurship! Anyone who wants to do a job vs. just have a job needs to investigate the career path of being a entrepreneur.
There are alternatives for individuals who can find a work life passion and create a business that will offer that employment life cycle without the fear of having that ax come down on them after years of giving a company their committed loyalty.
Organizations like Club eFactory, www.clubefactory.net, are a life-line for those individuals who have come to the point in their career that they can find an alternative to being another corporation statistic - and especially before they are featured in a news article.
BTW, this article hit home - I was a forced into entrepreneurship in the same way as Ed and now I just look back and wished I made a move before that day the "pink slip" showed up and I actually acted surprised. Like so many others in this same position, I was in denial up to that point it could ever have been me to be let go - when I down deep in my gut knew the almighty bottom-line $ meant more than my experience and loyalty!
# Posted By Neil Glenney | 4/13/09 7:33 AM
About Us | Advertising and Sponsorships | Advisory Services | Contact Us    © 2004-2012 Azul Partners, Inc. and Spend Matters. All Rights Reserved.