Supplier Management Watch: Is Manufacturing in Recovery – or Not?
If you believe the recent ISM manufacturing numbers, which Pat Furey recently highlighted over on Supply Excellence, it appears that the worst might be behind us in the manufacturing sector (except for full-time job seekers, that is). Pat notes, among other things, that the index continues to show a slight rise in overall activity, showing "the 4th consecutive month above 50," despite a modest decline from October's numbers. And new orders jumped above 60, which "means that production will have to increase in the following months to close the gap between bookings and inventory levels." But the employment portion of the index declined to near-contraction territory, hitting 50.8 and providing fuel to the fire for the suggestion that we're in a jobless recovery. From a manufacturing Spend Management perspective, how should we read into these numbers?
I think there are a few observations worth making. First, and perhaps
most important, even if we are in a sustained recovery, suppliers are
going to be as stingy with opening up new capacity as we are with
hiring new workers. In other words, don't expect suppliers to bring
mothballed capacity back online until it's absolutely needed and
profitable (which will probably be after their customers need it). If
you're not working with suppliers closely and are sure of the quality
of your relationships relative to others a supplier might have, then
it might be important to start to develop back-up plans for any demand
surges that might be coming down the pike. Translation: if you’ve
taken out the proverbial hammer from a reverse-auction standpoint of
late or generally ask for year-over-year price reductions without
developing a supplier, looking for joint areas of cost take-out, then
chances are you won't be their first choice when it comes to providing
materials or services in a capacity-constrained situation.
This same thinking also carries over to commodity markets as well,
many of which could be slow to bring capacity back online. Until there
are true signs of a long-term recovery, commodity availability across
a range of categories could be materially constrained in the early
parts of a recovery. The same could also be true from a talent-management
standpoint when it comes to contingent workers. While it's
unlikely that your organization will ramp up full-time hiring
aggressively in the early stages of recovery, they'll no doubt look to
add to their contingent workforce, in both production and non-production
areas. Just as commodities will be at a premium, so too
will contingent talent. If you don't have the right platform in place
to manage contingent hiring -– not to mention the right combination of
strategic and administrative services to absorb new capacity
requirements -– then you could very well find yourself getting fewer
resumes (and the wrong ones) for positions that your organization
needed to fill yesterday, not to mention paying above the benchmark
hourly rate.
TweetBacks






























It seems like the planning process works well when markets either go up or they go down but when they are volatile, move sideways or have small ups and downs, planning becomes much more difficult...