spendmatters
 

May 16, 2012

 

40,000 Sick Kids and Counting -- China Must Get Serious about Supply Risk

I live in a country that's full of hypocrisy. A capitalist society that socialized more for-profit institutions in a single week than Lenin did over his entire reign; a President who can't spell free trade yet supports it (when running for office); a Presidential candidate who plays the race card when campaigning to Lakeshore liberals in Chicago -- my neighbors had him speak at their house during a fundraiser and the specifics are a fascinating study in and of themselves -- yet then has his attack squad plant stories about how his potential loss could only be the result of racism. In other words, don't get me started on hypocrisy in the US. It's bipartisan and disgusting.

Fortunately, back in the States, few people die as a result -- especially not innocent children. We can't say the same for China. The latest supplier quality scandal to hit China is further proof that China, as a society, still tolerates abhorrent business practices that can lead to maiming and death for those whose only culpability is buying a product in an increasingly consumer driven society. Ironic, given China's free market embrace, isn't it? Sure, the government can arrest and shoot all of those associated with such an event -- as they will do -- but the intolerance of such behavior in the first place must come from the people, not the government. Chinese business culture must acquire a moral compass on the back of their profits -- not based on the threat of execution.



Consider the specifics of their latest supplier quality scandal. This is no accidental mistake. A supplier substituted the chemical Melamine, "commonly used in coatings and laminates, wood adhesives, fabric coatings, ceiling tiles and flame retardants" in products containing raw milk. Melamine is a byproduct of the plastics industry and "can be used to mimic high-protein additives," hence why it was used where milk was called for in a recipe. The result is that "China's Health Ministry said Sunday that about 13,000 children were hospitalized, while another 40,000 had undergone outpatient treatment for illnesses related to suspected melamine-tainted milk products." Four children have died from these tainted milk products. And a painful death it was.

According to CNN, "Health experts say ingesting melamine can lead to kidney stones, urinary tract ulcers, and eye and skin irritation. It also robs infants of essential nutrition." And if you recall, "Melamine is the same industrial contaminant from China that poisoned and killed thousands of U.S. dogs and cats last year." Even Nestle, a company that invests significantly in supplier quality and performance, is tied up in the scandal. Apparently a sample of their Dairy Farm Pure Milk tested positive for low-levels of Melamine in Hong Kong.

So what's the cure for what has amounted to a continuous supplier quality problem in China that puts profit ahead of all morals, of all ethics? From one who strongly disagrees with the concept of the death penalty, this is clearly a situation where past executions have had no effect on current business practices. So scratch the firing squad solution. What about technology? It’s too easy to game supplier performance and risk evaluations when there's insufficient data, so that wouldn't be much help either. Rather, Chinese society must stop tolerating this type of behavior at the core. Managers and workers must 'stand-up' when they suspect something is amiss. And Western companies doing business in the region should back-up their product specifications with frequent sample testing -- and let their suppliers know that such testing is going on. While we can't drive the solution, the Chinese -- like all peoples in a free trading world -- will at least respond to the threat of losing business.

- Jason Busch


TweetBacks
Comments
Torbjörn Thorsen's Gravatar Nestle is not the only western company that is tied into this scandal. Arla Foods, Europe's largest dairy producer, chinese joint venture partner Mengniu Dairy is one of the dairies involved. They've responded to the scandal by shutting down the production facility while waiting for testing equipment to be ordered and installed.
# Posted By Torbjörn Thorsen | 9/23/08 6:35 AM
dreck's Gravatar One, keep your political views to yourself...nobody cares what you think (other than you).

Two, I think that this will mark a turning point for them. When companies start hurting their children on a massive scale (we've really not seen anything quite like this milk scandal) they will respond in mass like any good parent will do.

I've always hoped that they, like a lot of countries, would learn from what just about every other country has learned the hard way...you cannot let business run unregulated. Profits will always trump people in that environment. This comes down to respect for people (all stakeholders) and there are very few companies that really care for anyone other than their stockholders.

Unfortunately, we never seem to learn either based on our latest financial meltdown.
# Posted By dreck | 9/24/08 6:57 AM
The SpendFool's Gravatar Hey Shrek, if you don't like the blog, don't read it. It's a blog, not Harvard Business Review. Say what you want Jason. It's called freedom of speech.
# Posted By The SpendFool | 9/24/08 9:50 AM
Barb's Gravatar I'm not convinced that even a loss of business will matter. Culture is notoriously difficult to change, and expediency is embedded in the Chinese culture. It's in the way they drive (the wrong way down a one way street if no one is coming), the way they cut in line if there is a centimeter of space, and obviously in the way they ignore quality and safety standards. They also don't value life as we do. This is evident in their continued killing of girl babies through abortion. So a few dead babies and executed executives is no big deal! We know that you can't inspect quality in. Companies need to seriously consider whether they can risk yet another Chinese quality/safety issue. These issues won't be going away soon!
# Posted By Barb | 9/24/08 4:10 PM
Thomas Kase's Gravatar I second Barb. This is cultural - the Chinese live in a high-population density country and have corresponding behavior. From many years of living & working in Japan and travelling on business elsewhere in Asia, the Chinese have always struck me as having the worst crowd behavior.

I discussed this over the weekend with a friend, a senior procurement exec in a US tech company, also with over a decade in SE Asia - we compared notes and here are our combined sentiments:

Japan
The Japanese take time to explain to, but do things to the 110% level

Korea
The Koreans don't need as much explaining, improvise more in the process and wind up at around 90%.

China
The Chinese on the other hand... don't take your eye off them if you want it done to spec and on time. Remember the old adage about price, quality and delivery - pick two...

What to do then? Maintain boots on the ground, stay in your suppliers faces with plant visits and so forth. Also, learn the language... that'll give you a cultural dose as well. Interpreters typically don't know business and engineering well enough to pick up on the topic - try not to use them.

Finally, several software solutions exist to make sure the efforts of a few (the boots on the ground) can be effectively shared across an organization to prevent disasters before they even take place. We all need to be proactive about this.

Thomas Kase

Sr. Sourcing Mgr - AECsoft USA
# Posted By Thomas Kase | 9/25/08 2:07 PM
About Us | Advertising and Sponsorships | Advisory Services | Contact Us    © 2004-2012 Azul Partners, Inc. and Spend Matters. All Rights Reserved.