spend matters spend matters About this site
Advertise with Spend Matters
Advertise with Spend Matters
 

August 20, 2008

 

Dockworkers -- Six Figure Strikers Creating Supply Risk

If we did not already have enough to worry about when it comes to global sourcing supply risk, we can now add a new -- well, old, but that's another story -- category into the mix: six figure strikers. That's right -- the California dockworkers are once again flexing their six-figure muscle. According to a recent story in The Trucker (hat-tip World Trade), "West Coast shippers said … that dockworkers at three California ports are intentionally slowing cargo movement and causing shipping delays as the two sides continue to negotiate a new contract. For nearly two weeks, workers at the ports of Los Angeles and Long Beach have been taking coordinated breaks and working slower." For those who are not familiar with the dockworkers this article, now six years old, has got some great facts and figures lest you begin to sympathize with these slowdown actions.

Just to name a few: Last time there was a strike, the dockworkers refused average salary increases to $114,500 and $137,500 depending on role. And in 2002, the cost of benefits was in excess of $40,000 per dockworker per year. Today, I'm estimating that the total compensation and benefits package for a dockworker is close to $200,000 per year -- maybe more. Of course there’s a great irony in this. And that’s that the workers across the Pacific in China are making 1/20th of this amount to do the same job. A metaphor for how union muscle has made the US uncompetitive in the world market for all but the highest value-added goods? I think so.

- Jason Busch

Comments
Without unions, you are correct: lines of sweating stevedores -- smoking opium to master their joint pain -- would be queued up daily in return for a bowl of rice or s'pore noodles.
# Posted By Nobody | 8/4/08 9:52 AM
I am all for livable wages and benefits, but I have a hard time believing that dockworkers are under-compensated at today's level. Heck, for $200K they could invest in some nice opium trading side businesses ... Moreover, ask yourself: if regular employees in a company had a work slowdown or stoppage, what would happen? You'd fire them or dock them on the grounds that they're not fulfilling their agreed-upon job duties. If they are members of a union, tough. You've got to file grievances and go through a convoluted process before anything comes of it.
# Posted By Jason Busch | 8/4/08 10:00 AM
You can't be for livable wages and at the same time advocate smashing unions -- because then there'd be a return to the age of the textile mills of the 1920's, where taking a sick day meant losing your job (my grandfather would be happy to fill you in on the details).

We are already headed in that direction in some industries. Consider the video-game company (I will not name them) that insists that programmers work every waking hour without overtime compensation, burns them out, and then replaces them with fresh meat when they can no longer sustain the pace.
# Posted By Nobody | 8/4/08 10:17 AM
Unions are one of several reasons why jobs, especially manufacturing, have left the U.S. and headed overseas. Unions served a purpose 50-60 years ago when labor laws were non-existant. Now they are a breeding ground for overpaid employees who do the bare minimum to get them through the day. I have managed in a union facility and the flexibility that is needed to run a facility in a profitable manner is all but gone. Unions aren't needed for liveable wages.
# Posted By Chad Hodges | 8/5/08 10:34 AM
Yes, managing in a union facility can be a horrific experience. I have had first-hand experience with that as well.

Inevitably, jobs that can be performed more cheaply elsewhere will move elsewhere. Equally inevitably, workers "elsewhere" will eventually come to the same realization as workers in the first world -- namely, that capital will always suppress and exploit labor whenever it can. It is the inexorable law of the market. Unfortunately, the only defense that has worked is collective bargaining.
# Posted By Nobody | 8/6/08 10:53 AM
Must be tough earning that kind of money working on the docks. Of course, they can always move up to be CEO of a company who also sits on the boards of other companies. Then they could just vote raises for the other CEOs who are on the board of their company and expect reciprocity when their negotiations come along.

No, I don't begrudge these guys getting whatever they can when I see the millions being paid to CEOs who run their companies into the ground and collect bonuses for laying people off. Just wish I could get out of the revolving door of layoffs, working as a contractor somewhere, getting a "permanent job," and more layoffs. White collare jobs in middle management aren't what they're cracked up to be - and we don't have the unions.
# Posted By N | 8/7/08 2:22 PM
About Us | Advertising and Sponsorships | Advisory Services | Contact Us   © 2004-2008 Spend Matters Publishing, Inc. All rights reserved.