spendmatters
 

May 16, 2012

 

BasWare Expands its Portfolio -- What Does it Mean?

BasWare, which built its Spend Management name largely on the payment side in Europe, recently announced it is expanding its footprint into the sourcing, contracts and collaboration space. I will withhold judgment on the new modules until I see them with my own eyes, but at this point, I still believe there are a couple of points worth noting. First, the fact that BasWare made the build rather than buy decision shows that for basic applications, development cycles are becoming far shorter and less risky. In other words, expect others to make similar "build" decisions in the future as well. Second, I question why a top downstream provider would seek to move upstream into more mature market segments (in my view, EIPP, especially, is just a huge opportunity waiting to happen). Perhaps it is because customers in Europe, especially, are increasingly looking for an integrated solution and SAP shops are increasingly willing to consider other options. Curious to get other opinions on the subject. Has anyone seen the products yet?

- Jason Busch


TweetBacks
Comments
Nobody's Gravatar You can hardly fault them for expanding their footprint. Even if part of said footprint has a crowded field of competitors. Most ERP vendors didn't start off with a strength in the entire suite of applications. SAP started with a financial thrust. Peoplesoft was an HR specialty. JD Edwards - Manufacturing. Etc. They grew to encompass the parts they were lacking. (And then at least two of them got swallowed up by Oracle!)

Spend Management is a smaller scale than an ERP provider but I don't fault any company from wanting at least the entire slice of that smaller scale.

I recently took a close look at the EIPP space and Basware ranked very high indeed. If they can expand their success to the rest of Spend Management, more power to them.
# Posted By Nobody | 6/6/08 4:39 PM
Jari Tavi's Gravatar The build vs buy is not based only faster development cycles and/or smaller risk path, but rather it is based (in Basware case) to integrated buyer side value chain approach. Personally I believe that one of the most important things when solving the purchase-to-pay challenge is to gain visibility over all of the processes building the buyer side landscape. As an example, from one real life customer, their purchase-to-pay process includes three (3) Level 2 processes and 58 Level 3 processes and a true spend management requires also the context of the spend and related processes in addition to "transactions". There is more about this topic in my blog:
http://blog.basware.com/procurement/procurement-th...

In short: I believe in early validation, enrichment and cleansing instead of "patching" processes with complex tools later on.


cheers,

-jari
# Posted By Jari Tavi | 6/16/08 2:13 AM
About Us | Advertising and Sponsorships | Advisory Services | Contact Us    © 2004-2012 Azul Partners, Inc. and Spend Matters. All Rights Reserved.