spend matters spend matters About this site

Want to reach procurement and supply chain decision-makers?

Advertise with Spend Matters Navigator
 

May 16, 2008

 

Do the Benefits of Global Sourcing Still Add Up?

Supply and Demand Chain Executive has recently picked up its coverage of global sourcing topics. Much of this recent coverage has really hit the mark. For example, a recent guest submission by John Brockwell of JP Morgan Chase questions whether global sourcing is really worth it anymore. In my view, this a fair question for US companies in today's environment owing to concerns over product safety and declining -- or lost -- savings from the troubled dollar. Brockwell suggests that there are many reasons to still consider global sources ranging from "access to fresh research, design or specialized intellectual capital" or "plans to sell or service locally."

Even more important than the rationale for global sourcing, he offers up a decision process that executives should ask themselves about whether a specific global sourcing decision makes sense. While much of what he has to say will be news only to those getting started with global sourcing, the advice is valuable indeed. But is Brockwell accurate in his analysis? For the most part, I believe that much of what he has to say could have saved many companies from poor global sourcing decisions had they followed the advice in the article in the first place. Check out the piece for yourself and decide for yourself. It's more than worth a few minutes of your time.

- Jason Busch

Comments
Yet another article discussing retreat from globalization. John Brockwell's article raises a lot of issues that companies that sell globally should regard as equally important with domestic sourcing: Inflation rates, payment terms, working capital, flexibility, quality, strength of the supplier's currency and total landed cost.

What are the issues about sourcing across borders that make it more difficult than domestic sourcing? Distance? Sometimes. However, Guadalajara, Mexico is closer to Chicago than San Francisco is. There are huge areas of Poland closer to Berlin than Munich is. If your product is "economically dense" enough (high value per kilogram) to be able to justify air freight, it's only a day or two more to get goods to a US port of entry from a supplier near any major airport. And if your customs clearance is more than a day or two something is wrong with your processes.

He does raise a few legitimate issues that are specific to border-crossing: Duties and geopolitics are two.

Sometimes controlling the vocabulary of the discussion can preordain the conclusion. Why should domestic sourcing be the norm and global sourcing be something special? Would you consider sourcing only in your home city or state? Why would you draw a line at a national border? That just doesn't seem appropriate in the 21st century.
# Posted By Dick Locke | 4/12/08 5:40 AM
It seems as though the "review your loans carefully memo" came out at JP MorganChase...sort of interesting given the fact that L/C's tend to be some of the safest financial instruments these days.

All of the writer's suggestions on questions to ask before placing that overseas purchase order make sense. And I would argue that smart companies are reviewing their answers to these questions more rigorously than say a couple of years ago. But to suggest that global sourcing might not make sense anymore as a sort of a blanket statement seems really quite silly. As for China hysteria, "this too shall pass..."
# Posted By Lisa Reisman | 4/13/08 12:52 PM
I have to disagree with Lisa: China hysteria will not go away any time soon. The Chinese government really only pays lip service to issues of product quality. Anyone who has tried to breathe the air in Beijing, or worse, any of their industrial centers, can tell at first inhale that the Chinese have a very high tolerance for chemicals in the environment. Until the US starts cancelling orders on a grand scale, China will continue to put out products that violate USA safety standards. It's not that they are TRYING to do this, it's just that concepts of personal and environmental safety are not a part of their national business psychology. Here in the USA, it took boycotts, lawsuits, OSHA, and the EPA to get companies to stop polluting our air and rivers, to get lead out of paint, to make thousands of product changes for safety's sake. China is just starting down that road. And given the government's lack of concern for their own citizens' safety, getting them down that road is going to take a lot of kicking, screaming, and foot-dragging. Anyone who expects China to clean up its act anytime in the near future is dreaming.
# Posted By Jim Hart | 4/14/08 6:46 AM
About Us | Advertise | Getting Started | How and Why | Contact Us   © 2004-2007 Spend Matters Publishing, Inc. All rights reserved.