spendmatters
 

February 08, 2012

 

Not Too Shabby -- D&B's $92 Million Spend Visibility Deal

For years, the supply management group at D&B has played second fiddle to the sales / risk management (i.e., credit) solutions the company offers. But now that part of the old Open Ratings leadership is leading the charge for D&B Supply Management Solutions strategy, might things be changing? Judging by a recent $92 million dollar deal with the Federal government, I'd reckon they are.



According to D&B's transcript from their last quarterly results (about the only way the company ever shares any information publicly), "we've already made good progress in this area [supply management] and, ultimately, this focus will allow us to become more embedded in our operations over time. As one example, we signed a five-year, $92 million contract with the General Services Administration (GSA) of the Federal Government during the quarter. This project is designed to help the Government provide a higher degree of transparency into federal spending. This deal significantly expands upon our existing relationship with the GSA -- more than doubling our annual contract value with this customer over the past two years."

$92 million bucks for spend visibility? Now that's a deal to write home about (and hopefully one that will draw attention to the potential for SMS within D&B's credit and risk focused management team). But as important, I'm just as excited about D&B's new UI and features for a number of their supply management products, a topic which I'll explore in the next few weeks.

- Jason Busch


Commodity Edge Conference

TweetBacks
Comments
I doubt it's Gravatar There has to be more to this deal than spend visibility.
# Posted By I doubt it | 9/17/07 10:16 AM
Jason Busch's Gravatar I doubt it,

I, too, would like to know as well. Anyone have any insight into this deal, other than what D&B said in their earnings call?

- Jason
# Posted By Jason Busch | 9/17/07 11:11 AM
Uncle Sam's Gravatar I recently read about a pair of sisters who sent bogus invoices to GSA and were paid about $12MM before they were busted. I would say they need some level of visibility. But, unless D&B is in a new business, I am sure this is just repackaging of thier old content. Additionally, when you breakdown the numbers its $18.4MM a year which while still a lot of dough...I would suspect this contact is a govt special that allows UP to XX for the services if the agencies use it.

We all know that D&B is not in the Spend Visibility business.
# Posted By Uncle Sam | 9/18/07 5:02 AM
Ken's Gravatar My D&B sales rep. has begun to try to sell me their spend visibility services but admitted that they are pretty new. I wonder if they picked up some of this functionality from their acquisition of Open Ratings?
# Posted By Ken | 9/18/07 5:33 AM
RB's Gravatar I had their solution demo'd to me a few months ago. Noble attempt, but quite a watered down version of what others have. However, their risk management suite and the ability to use the tool old Supplier Optimizer, is a great aid for decentralized companies just starting their journey. It's pretty well priced too.
# Posted By RB | 9/19/07 10:46 AM
About Us | Advertising and Sponsorships | Advisory Services | Contact Us    © 2004-2012 Azul Partners, Inc. and Spend Matters. All Rights Reserved.