spend matters spend matters About this site
Advertise with Spend Matters
Advertise with Spend Matters
 

March 19, 2010

 

Zycus: Thinking (and Planning) for Big Things

Last week, I had a quick update call with Zycus to check in and see how things were progressing with a vendor that until recently, was known just for its data cleansing and classification capability. But my, it's amazing how sometimes things can change so quickly. In the past year, Zycus introduced what is really a revolutionary front-end analytics component to their cleansing and classification system. I previously wrote about this "actionable analytics" approach to spend analysis earlier in the year. In my original post on their novel new solution I posed the question: "Where is Zycus headed with this?"

I answered: "If you're thinking spend analysis meets bubble chart sourcing strategy development, you'd be on the right track. But Zycus is going after this vision in a largely automated manner without $2500 / day management consultants analyzing the results and developing a strategy for you ... It's slick (and not in a Clinton-esque way). If you were previously looking at Zycus as just a focused classification and enrichment and provider within an integrated spend visibility deployment, you owe it to yourself to see how far they've come on the analytical side."

Since the announcement, Zycus has been busy on the customer acquisition front. Already, Conoco Phillips has adopted the solution, processing some 15 million transactions annually covering $128 billion in spend, using both Zycus AutoClass and Actionable Analytics. And Visant, Siemens UK, and Diageo have also deployed the new front end as well, among others. But what's next for Zycus in the coming years?

Going forward, Zycus suggested to me that they want to expand out of their best-of-breed spend analysis roots and grow into a "top 3" suite provider in the sector in terms of revenue. What product directions will Zycus head in? You can bet sourcing will be a part of their strategy, as will other aspects of "supply management," as they term it. But eProcurement is out, in their words. So I'm guessing that leaves supplier performance / risk management, e-sourcing, contract management, and other related areas to delve into. I also expect we'll be hearing a lot from Zycus on the Master Data Management (MDM) front as well, but I'll save that for a different blog post.

On the global front, Zycus plans to keep a strong presence in North America, but also expand significantly into Europe and Asia/Pacific (Asia/Pacific, in particular, is a region which they see tremendous opportunity for expansion). But regardless of where they go, one thing will be for sure. And that's they'll stick to their profitable (in excess of 30% net margin) knitting.

I believe that for investors contemplating investments in private or public companies in the sector outside of North America and Europe, Zycus can serve as proof that it's possible to build a successful global solutions play, leveraging not just lower cost talent from India for development, but off-shore software development expertise as well (that can't be found elsewhere). In fact, I would suspect that we'll see many more Zycus-like vendors to emerge from India and China in the future (maybe not in the Spend Management area, but certainly elsewhere). These providers and vendors will not ride just ride the coattails of Western vendors with lower prices, but like Zycus, they'll break entirely new ground, often in existing markets, charging premium price points for innovative solutions.

- Jason Busch

Related Blog Entries

Comments
It's not that consultants are so much smarter than the rest of us. It's that they've sourced the very category that you're thinking of sourcing, and they did it yesterday for someone just like you. Thus, consultants bring highly relevant benchmarking knowledge with them, as well as detailed knowledge about the savings levers that apply to the category at a particular point in time. You're paying for that knowledge, not necessarily for the mechanics of sourcing expertise (which you may already have in house).

The problem is that the above knowledge is often good only for a short period of time, since pricing and market conditions are constantly changing. Which is why firms like Denali, a commodity-specific benchmark data provider, issue frequent updates to their reports.

The notion that automated analytical reports can replace sourcing consultants is naive. Great spend analysis has been around for 15+ years (starting with folks like Analytics). If a suite of reports could replace sourcing consultants, there wouldn't be any sourcing consultants by now. Sourcing is not rocket science, but it requires more than a computer program to be successful.
# Posted By Eric Strovink | 8/8/07 3:55 AM
Thanks for keeping us up-to-date on Zycus - they really do have some great "beginning-of-the-sourcing-cycle" functionality. But did you get the chance to drill down into why "eProcurement is out?"

It would seem to me that would be a critical bridge between their current data cleansing and analytics and the supplier performance, contract management, and other solutions you suspect they will develop.
# Posted By Charles Dominick, SPSM | 8/8/07 5:26 AM
Jason,

How will there entry into the market impact companies such as tradebeam, procurri, verticalnet, etc.

Do you see some of the smaller companies following in perfect's path?
# Posted By Don | 8/8/07 5:47 AM
What amazes me the most is that you can get up there with a straight face and say...they deserve another look...from a phone call. Shallow and pandering or so it seems to me.

I also know alot about Zycus and I suggest that you do your own due diligence!
# Posted By Amazed | 8/8/07 6:21 AM
Amazed,

I've had multiple conversations and face to face meetings with Zycus in the past 6 months, but I'd suggest that everyone judge for themselves.

Cheers, Jason
# Posted By Jason Busch | 8/8/07 7:10 AM
NOTE:

This comment was deleted by Jason Busch as it was not in good taste.

# Posted By back at you amazed | 8/9/07 5:23 AM
No doubt they have good impact across globe but their working methodology doesn't similar to their name & fame. It is better to leave them before association. Very disgusting kind of principle they follows. No t/c before hiring of services & once they hire services they forces to do illegal things.....disgusting......
# Posted By unknown | 8/28/08 5:59 AM
About Us | Advertising and Sponsorships | Advisory Services | Contact Us   © 2004-2010 Spend Matters, LP All rights reserved