spend matters spend matters About this site
Advertise with Spend Matters
Advertise with Spend Matters
 

March 12, 2010

 

Globalization, Price Deflation and Flat Panel TVs

Earlier in the week, McPaper (AKA: USA Today) ran an insightful story -- yes, it can actually happen on occasion -- matter-of-factly titled "Flat-panel TVs display the effects of globalization". Even though a protectionist bias is evident in the quotations and citations at the end -- USA Today is, after all, the purest form of populism in newsprint -- I still found the article useful nonetheless. The story traces the evolution and drastically falling prices of plasma and LCD televisions as they begin their journey in "state-of-the-art fabrication centers in South Korea, Taiwan and Japan, where the glass panels that form the televisions' heart are produced ... to Mexican plants clustered along the U.S. border” where the screens are “assembled into cabinets and loaded onto trucks bound for retailers such as Circuit City and Wal-Mart."

The piece notes that "Each link in this global supply chain specializes in what it does best and at lowest cost. By collaborating across time zones and oceans, these industrial networks have driven costs down and performance up in ways no single company ever could … The high levels of capital, skilled labor and technology required were more than any single company possessed, so "meta-national" networks emerged ... By cherry-picking talent and capital from around the globe, these cross-border alliances breached technological barriers at a blistering pace."

This revolution is a modern one that depends on automation and engineering know-how rather than low cost labor. Consider that "unlike the textile or furniture plants that increasingly have moved abroad to capitalize on endless supplies of low-wage labor, the Asian factories that produce flat-panel TVs are highly automated and staffed by skilled engineers." All in all, a good quick history lesson about the rise of a new industry and integrated and interdependent global supply chain, but in the end, it's one skewed by a bitching and moaning about lost domestic jobs. I guess McPaper is just serving up what its readership expects.

- Jason Busch

Comments
Maybe McPaper can take a lesson from McDonald's and be a little more socially responsible and, one day a year, donate a fixed amount of all paper sales to a charity. (And yes, I had my yearly Big Mac here in Canada yesterday - even though I probably should have saved my mouth, and stomach and just donated direct to the charity. ;-) )
# Posted By Michael Lamoureux | 5/10/07 1:30 PM
From a spend management standpoint, Michael, I should point out that it is much more cost effective to order three hamburgers and a cup of tap water. This will get you the equivalent calories at a small fraction of the price.

Know your supplier and his pricing patterns. The profit margin on the basic hamburger is quite slim. The real money is made on fries, drinks, and specialty sandwiches.
# Posted By Eric Strovink | 5/10/07 5:16 PM
Michael and Eric, this skates dangerously close to the margins enjoyed by fine restaurants and their wine lists. Something our friend and noble blogger might take personally, methinks. Heaven forbid we start to think about the spend management implications of fine cigars!
# Posted By Kevin Brooks | 5/10/07 11:05 PM
At ISM I went to a dinner where someone else was paying (who is probably reading this) and I picked out the wine -- a situation I'm usually fine with if the mark-ups are reasonable and I can be thrifty. But at the place we went to, the mark-ups were insane -- 4x, 5x. I ordered the cheapest decent bottle on the list ($80) and found myself apologizing (I’m not such a cheap bastard if it’s my money, but if it’s someone else’s, I’m always sensitive). IMHO, restaurants that need to make all their money on wine will never be long-lived. That is, unless they've got a captive audience in places like Vegas. Perhaps the spend management thing to do is just sneak in a flask filled with a single malt ...
# Posted By Jason Busch | 5/11/07 4:32 AM
Yes indeed that was a pricey bottle of wine and I'm embarrassed to admit that I chugged the last glass like it was Two Buck Chuck...but after all we were in a hurry to get to Spamalot on time. If I had known they were going to leave out my part I would have lingered over the wine and missed the Fisch Schlapping Song.

But the company and the conversation were both outstanding and after all, we were at Wynn's. Money doesn't buy happiness but it is highly correlated with pleasant venues in Las Vegas.

Las Vegas was a terrible choice for a conference for Procurement professionals. $80 for a decent bottle of wine? $4 for a bottle of water? $5 to print out your boarding pass in the Bally's business center? Minneapolis and San Antonio are looking better than ever in the rear view mirror.

- Roger the Shrubber
# Posted By Roger the Shrubber | 5/11/07 9:35 AM
About Us | Advertising and Sponsorships | Advisory Services | Contact Us   © 2004-2010 Spend Matters, LP All rights reserved