A Supply Chain Disruption Hits Ontario
I know what you're thinking. Another post on supply risk. This Busch character -- along with Mark Hillman, Tim Minahan, David Bush, Jim Lawton, Michael Lamoureux and others pundits -- are obsessed by a topic that up until now has only impacted a minority of organizations in recent years. But ignoring supply risk is simply not an option (unless you want it to bite you). That's because the potential for broader supply chain disruptions are very real today across the globe. And they're increasing everyday thanks to the combination of economic, trade, political, military, and even weather risks that seem to be hitting the newswire on the hour.
In late February, David Rotar shared an example of a supply disruption in Ontario, Canada, involving Imperial (Esso) oil. According to David, the summary of the story is that, "a couple of refinery fires to constrain production", the "winter closing of the St. Lawrence Seaway", and a "a rail strike to further limit distribution" all combined to create gasoline shortages in his province. "The result has been a 25% spike in retail prices for gasoline and 'dozens' of gas stations being closed due to lack of [supply]."
In my experience, supply risk shortages are usually based on a combination of avoidable and unavoidable factors. The avoidable include stocking adequate inventory given other risk factors in a supply region, maintaining visibility and controls into extended supply chain operations, and having ready-to-deploy supply risk management contingency plans already in place should a disruption or other risk appear imminent. Without a combination of these, when an unavoidable event (e.g., a weather disruption or labor strike) occurs, a supply disruption can strike anytime, anywhere.
- Jason Busch
In late February, David Rotar shared an example of a supply disruption in Ontario, Canada, involving Imperial (Esso) oil. According to David, the summary of the story is that, "a couple of refinery fires to constrain production", the "winter closing of the St. Lawrence Seaway", and a "a rail strike to further limit distribution" all combined to create gasoline shortages in his province. "The result has been a 25% spike in retail prices for gasoline and 'dozens' of gas stations being closed due to lack of [supply]."
In my experience, supply risk shortages are usually based on a combination of avoidable and unavoidable factors. The avoidable include stocking adequate inventory given other risk factors in a supply region, maintaining visibility and controls into extended supply chain operations, and having ready-to-deploy supply risk management contingency plans already in place should a disruption or other risk appear imminent. Without a combination of these, when an unavoidable event (e.g., a weather disruption or labor strike) occurs, a supply disruption can strike anytime, anywhere.
- Jason Busch
















(1) The closure of the St. Lawrence Seaway in the winter is a given…even in the age of inconvenient truths.
(2) The rail strike is something that a reasonable person could and should anticipate. Like the 2002 West Coast Longshoremen's strike, this one put on its blinkers well before making the turn.
(3) Refinery fires are something that a corporate risk manager would anticipate and would subject to basic risk management principles.
Note that while supplier financial stability is an important part of a supply risk framework, it's not present as a factor here…although it may crop up as an aftershock.
The Spend Fool had it right when he said "The really important risk management stuff is not some external supplier attribute database fed with supplier scorecard data into an automagical warning generator, but rather, good scenario planning processes which look holistically at all risk factors and their expected frequency & consequences.”
http://abclocal.go.com/ktrk/story?section=nation_w...
Maybe Tipper has been lighting the grail-shaped beacon a little too often...
Give the man a break. I mean, come on. He's packed on a few pounds in the past few years, and I'm sure he did the carbon footprint analysis of cooking with his smokin' Bar-B-Q vs keeping the Viking oven running continuously in the kitchen. Or maybe Tipper is in fact burning it at both ends ... ;-)
Perhaps Tipper and Al should catch up on their PJ O'Rourke
"Anyway, blaming the onset of earth-is-toast on the "wealthy few" seems a tad unscientific … The earth had temperature cycles when the wealthy few were lucky trilobites with extra-rich muck to frolic in. And how are we going to solve the problems of those who "live a marginal existence in equatorial climates" such as that of Washington, D.C., if we don't produce more of the industrial prosperity that boils their weather? It's going to take a bunch of Nobel laureates to figure that out. Or not."
http://www.courant.com/news/politics/hc-raucous030...,0,2259503.story