spend matters spend matters About this site
Advertise with Spend Matters
Advertise with Spend Matters
 

March 14, 2010

 

LCCS Alone Will Not Save Anyone (Even Chrysler)

Take it from a procurement pundit. As a shareholder, whenever you see low cost country sourcing at the center of a turnaround strategy -- rather than as a component of an overall procurement and operations strategy -- duck and run for cover. For, as GM has learned so well, cutting unit costs alone by sourcing from China will not save a company -- it will prolong an agonizing death, but it won't overcome it. After all, if a manufacturer -- or even a service provider -- is not providing products that businesses or consumers want, even the best cost cutting programs will only go so far. And low cost country sourcing, alone, is an especially short-sighted strategy (especially given rising labor and commodity prices worldwide, not to mention the tariff mongering, protectionist viewpoints of politicians on both sides of the isle today). Sure, Chrysler will save a few bucks on unit cost in the near term given their current plan, but long term, unless they start building products that people want as well as focusing on sustainable procurement cost savings and cost avoidance activities -- instead of LCCS one hit unit-cost wonders -- I'd stay far away.

- Jason Busch

Comments
I'm continually perplexed by these tactics in automotive, when companies like Toyota and Honda have such well-documented methods that are fundamentally different and successful. I'd love to hear some theories from those more in the know as to why Chrysler and GM have gone down this path. Is it simply survivalist? Anyone?
# Posted By Don MacLennan | 3/7/07 9:36 AM
I'm sure Tim over at Supply Excellence (www.supplyexcellence.com) would be happy to offer up some theories in his regular Detroit Posts. It's his favorite subject! ;-)

Feb 28: Who's the Boss? Chrysler May be Bought by its Supplier
Feb 23: Chrysler: What Went Wrong
Jan 26: Can Supply Management Jumpstart Detroit?
etc.

But I think the important question here is - does our editor have Detroit Supply Chain on the Brain as well?

Mar 7: LCCS Alone will Not Save Anyone (Even Chrysler)
Mar 1: Chrysler: Pulling the Three Pointed Star Down
Feb 2: A Spend Management Update from Detroit
etc.

At the rate things are going, maybe we'll soon see a "Save Detroit" blogger-driven conference ... stranger things can happen!

It's too bad those Geico cavemen are too busy working on a pilot for ABC ... I think they're just what Detroit needs!
# Posted By Michael Lamoureux | 3/7/07 11:00 AM
There are no quick or easy wins left for Daimler-Chrysler, they have been in LCCS for years and have wrung the obvious dollars out of their purchasing options already. For example D-C have been buying their crankshafts from India for the last five years, for them now to push billions of dollars more spend to LCCS will mean them sourcing progressively more complex components with associated quality risks. They would be better advised pouring their dollars and focus on the product range rather than making a greater push into LCCS.
# Posted By Stuart Burns | 3/8/07 8:39 AM
I suggest we all redefine what LCC stand for. Should be "Leading Competitive Countries", because that is what they are. The other definition is somewhat derogatory.
# Posted By Dennie Norman | 3/8/07 8:49 AM
About Us | Advertising and Sponsorships | Advisory Services | Contact Us   © 2004-2010 Spend Matters, LP All rights reserved