LCCS Alone Will Not Save Anyone (Even Chrysler)
Take it from a procurement pundit. As a shareholder, whenever you see low cost country sourcing at the center of a turnaround strategy -- rather than as a component of an overall procurement and operations strategy -- duck and run for cover. For, as GM has learned so well, cutting unit costs alone by sourcing from China will not save a company -- it will prolong an agonizing death, but it won't overcome it. After all, if a manufacturer -- or even a service provider -- is not providing products that businesses or consumers want, even the best cost cutting programs will only go so far. And low cost country sourcing, alone, is an especially short-sighted strategy (especially given rising labor and commodity prices worldwide, not to mention the tariff mongering, protectionist viewpoints of politicians on both sides of the isle today). Sure, Chrysler will save a few bucks on unit cost in the near term given their current plan, but long term, unless they start building products that people want as well as focusing on sustainable procurement cost savings and cost avoidance activities -- instead of LCCS one hit unit-cost wonders -- I'd stay far away.
- Jason Busch
- Jason Busch
















Feb 28: Who's the Boss? Chrysler May be Bought by its Supplier
Feb 23: Chrysler: What Went Wrong
Jan 26: Can Supply Management Jumpstart Detroit?
etc.
But I think the important question here is - does our editor have Detroit Supply Chain on the Brain as well?
Mar 7: LCCS Alone will Not Save Anyone (Even Chrysler)
Mar 1: Chrysler: Pulling the Three Pointed Star Down
Feb 2: A Spend Management Update from Detroit
etc.
At the rate things are going, maybe we'll soon see a "Save Detroit" blogger-driven conference ... stranger things can happen!
It's too bad those Geico cavemen are too busy working on a pilot for ABC ... I think they're just what Detroit needs!