spend matters spend matters About this site
Advertise with Spend Matters
Advertise with Spend Matters
 

March 13, 2010

 

Selling the Value of Procurement to the Business

Over the years on Spend Matters, I've written at least a few times about the need to more effectively market the value of Spend Management to the business. But getting the right type of attention from finance, operations, and P&L owners is not simply as easy as parading in a ROI model to justify incremental headcount or the latest and greatest technology.

No, marketing is both an art and a science, and while financial models can be invaluable, they're only part of winning the hearts and minds of other business stakeholders. Just as the most successful technology vendors have succeeded in positioning their solutions by selling "the afterlife" to justify their historically fat margins -- relative to other businesses -- sourcing and procurement leaders must learn to sell not only returns, but how great things will become if only their advice is heeded. Selling the afterlife and winning over supporters requires both an overall vision as well as tactical execution. In the rest of this post, I will stick to the tactics (I'll discuss what it takes to create and relay a vision in a future post).

In my view, procurement teams must think of themselves as ambassadors, conducting positioning and marketing campaigns accordingly. What are elements of successful marketing programs that I've seen work? For one, internal newsletters aimed at highlighting overall results as well as individual contributions -- not to mentioning educating an extended group on processes and technology -- are a great start. In addition, creating award systems where senior business executives recognize the value of individual or team accomplishments can also help.

What are some other tactics and approaches to take? Earlier in the month, the National Association of Purchasing and Payables Conference featured a number of speakers who tackled this subject. According to a write-up in Purchasing, Jon Stephens, Senior Director of Marketing Procurement -- yes, that's the correct title -- at Microsoft, noted that "You have to sell the discipline and yourself .... The businesses have to believe in you. To earn that trust, you need to be familiar with the subculture of the business and you need to understand what the business values." Amex's Susan Feiner, another speaker at the event, noted that "To sustain our success, we need to treat the businesses as customers" by creating a formalized approach to track customer satisfaction.

Obviously these suggestions are just a start. I look forward to continuing to tackle this subject on Spend Matters, sharing additional details on both tactical and visionary elements of marketing procurement to the business. Next week, I'll tackle in more detail what it means to sell the Spend Management afterlife.

- Jason Busch

Comments
Hi Jason must be a coincidence but as per my post on the esourcing forum (day 1) selling Spend Analysis internally was something that many delegates raised as an issue.

However in reality procurement must earn credibility first and often this is in terms of delivering successful eSourcing strategies first. In my own opinion spend analysis and eSourcing should be implemented hand in hand but I haven't found anyone brave enough yet!
# Posted By Sean Delaney | 2/22/07 4:57 AM
A trend I am seeing is IT stepping up to the plate to try to "solve all the information problems in the enterprise" by itself. This is praiseworthy, of course, but since usually IT has no clue about procurement and its specialized needs, it's a disastrous outcome for many companies. One can almost watch the spend management clock freezing for the 18-24 months it will take for management to conclude that the expensive tools IT has purchased aren't delivering.

And I say this as a technologist with the greatest fondness and sympathy for IT folks and their mission.
# Posted By Eric Strovink | 2/22/07 5:09 AM
Eric, Procurement should not pity IT, but empathize, because Procurement is usually viewed in the same light. Both lead amazingly parallel lives. They complain about the same things, both wanting better alignment, earlier influence, better support for enforcement/compliance, desire for standardization, etc. and are often both viewed as old-school, bureaucratic, self-serving administrators. Too many Procurement organizations whine "we don't mandate anything around here", but if a policy of Procurement involvement on contracts greater than $__k is suddenly granted, Procurement often fails because of poor capacity, business knowledge, and thus lack of value-add, setting it's transformation back. I won't even talk about how Procurement and IT work (or don't work) together not just as internal suppliers and buyers to each, but how they go to the business with an integrated value proposition.
I don't mean to be a chicken little fool, but you need to make the tacit explicit, and not diss it, if you're gonna fix it. word.
# Posted By SpendFool | 2/22/07 8:41 AM
To Sean's points, having the capability to conduct a spend analysis and develop a fact-based business case justifying a broader procurement role provides a massive boost to the effectiveness of any internal marketing program for spend management. The concept of marketing procurement to internal customers has been evangelized for many years but now the tools are there (and becoming better) to quantify the benefits. For a CPO looking to increase spend under management, for example, it makes sense to spend some time up front conducting a spend analysis to determine the high spend/"unmanaged by procurement" categories and then develop internal marketing plans to the the stakeholders for these categories. This way, (i) you know you're focusing your effort in the right places (good marketing programs take a lot of effort), and (ii) you approach the stakeholder armed with high value data that can help them as opposed to generalities, e.g. maybe the Facilities Director didn't even know he only had 25% of his spend with the preferred vendor, and by pulling the other 75% back onto contract he could use the savings to start the projects he didn't have funds for. By winning him over with this value, you are far more likely to be invited to participate in broader sourcing-related initiatives covering his area. So the big point is, use your spend analysis results to craft stakeholder marketing programs that clearly describe the tangible benefits of your increased involvement.
# Posted By Mark Usher | 2/22/07 9:46 AM
About Us | Advertising and Sponsorships | Advisory Services | Contact Us   © 2004-2010 Spend Matters, LP All rights reserved