spend matters spend matters About this site

Want to reach procurement and supply chain decision-makers?

Advertise with Spend Matters Navigator
 

May 16, 2008

 

All Roads Lead to Online Global Sourcing

My Shanghai-based colleague Richard Brubaker, who pens the well-known China business and supply chain blog All Roads Lead to China, has been quite busy of late offering up his prognostications on everything from the future of China quality to inland logistics in his adopted country. But he recently took a few minutes away from the blogging world to author a short piece in Industry Week about how the Internet has changed global sourcing, supplier identification, and relationship management.



In the column, Richard does a good job describing the slow death of the trading business as more and more companies have gone the direct relationship route using the Internet: "As recently as five years ago, the process of finding a supplier usually involved engaging a Chicago, New York, or Los Angeles-based trading firm to act as liaison to a Hong Kong or Taiwanese trading firm, who in turn may have contacts with a mainland distributor who may actually know a factory -- with each tier pocketing a fee ... Now with tools like Alibaba, Made in China, and Global Sources, buyers across the globe can identify potential suppliers and view sample products online from ... Without a doubt, the most visible benefit to these tools has been the ability to leap over layers of middlemen by enabling foreign buyers to either work with the manufacturer directly, or with a China-based trading company who can manage multiple suppliers on their behalf."

But have we really eliminated the trading companies? If you talk to any experienced global sourcing hand who uses Albiba or any of the other sources Richard sites, they'll tell you that trading companies are still present on these sites -- but now they often hide behind layers of virtual factory walkthroughs, bogus quality certifications and other online artifices designed to make Western companies feel more comfortable about doing business with them. In fact, one of the biggest challenges of these directories is that they serve as little more than virtual storefronts, but without any type of trusted Better Business or Zagat-like rating system to tell you if the capabilities that someone is claiming are actually real. Because of this, I agree with Richard that "the move away from using personal introductions to find suppliers has greatly reduced front-end costs, while creating a need for greater attention at the back end ... The recent spate of recalls of Chinese products over safety concerns illustrate that diligent buyer-oversight is indispensable to ensure the product you think you're ordering gets delivered to your warehouse."

I'm guessing that we'll eventually see social-network based types of rating systems -- or online communities of interest -- become the norm in sourcing environments, enabling companies and individuals to share information on supplier performance, quality and risk. As Pierre Mitchell would call it, we need eHarmony or Match.com for global sourcing (tossed in with a bit of Facebook and LinkedIn for good measure). But until then, if you want to sleep better at night knowing that those containers on the water contain exactly what you want, are packed correctly, and will arrive on time, there will be no substitute for having an on the ground presence in the countries you're doing business in to keep your global supply chain honest.

- Jason Busch

Comments
I agree completely that the sourcing sites need some kind of third party certification. I would also like to add that there needs to be a standardized classification scheme for ease of use.

On the third party issue, a few years ago SGS (www.sgs.com) was certifying suppliers on the meetworldtrade web site. That effort seems to have gone away. I don't think that the idea of social networking between buyers will fly. Companies (even those who don't manufacture any more) believe their procurement operations give them a competitive advantage, and are going to be unwilling to share information. There is still room for a third party qualification company, one that does not benefit from any resulting business between buyer and seller.

On the classification scheme issue, does anyone see anything wrong with the UNSPSC scheme? Or if you see problems, is there a better scheme that is likely to be usable globally with respect to both geography and industry?
# Posted By Dick Locke | 11/6/07 7:23 AM
Interesting article! I used to think that the only two ways one could be sure that goods were coming in as per the intended order were a) on the ground resources and b) third parties. The more we source from China and elsewhere, the more we realize all of the holes in both strategies. In other words, nothing is perfect. However, I do see companies like MFG changing the landscape through their rating systems. It will take some more time and some more traction within various markets but I don't see why social networking/ebay-styled ratings would not work. They are already in full blown use on MFG.

I once worked with a scoundrel (back in my metals trading days) and he changed his name and his company name multiple times but everyone still knew who he was, where he was and what he was doing. Those that chose to deal with him (stupidly) took on a "buyer beware" mentality. The more social networking and ebay styled ratings become the standard (which I think they will), the more we'll see the scoundrels can run but they won't be able to hide. I think this goes for both trading companies and manufacturers...

My $.02.
# Posted By Lisa Reisman | 11/6/07 9:50 AM
Jason,

Thanks for the plug!

I would like to point out that your link to All Roads is actually a link to your own blog.. like a continuous loop!

Dick,

I just covered the recent import safety "plan" on All Roads. My take is that they have done what they needed to get reelected as the average consumer will think these are tough measures against exporters.

The fact though is that I don't think these recommendations will have much of an impact on the whole and that these measures are about as useful as taking off your shoes at the airport when cargo goes unchecked.

Lisa,

Hope all is well. I recently was asked to assist on a similar case, and while I was tempted to provide a quote for tracking the guy down and getting the product out of him, I recognized right away that the cost to do so was not justified. Sometimes, you just gotta move on the next slim shady.

Have a good weekend
R

www.allroadsleadtochina.com
# Posted By Allroads | 11/8/07 10:18 AM
Richard,

It's fixed! Thanks for pointing out the linking error.

Cheers, Jason
# Posted By Jason Busch | 11/8/07 6:24 PM
About Us | Advertise | Getting Started | How and Why | Contact Us   © 2004-2007 Spend Matters Publishing, Inc. All rights reserved.