Emptoris Ups the Supplier Performance Ante
To begin, Emptoris 7 is available in three variants: Basic (in a SaaS delivery model), Professional (also in a SaaS delivery model) and Enterprise (available in either a SaaS delivery model or as a behind the firewall deployment). As you might imagine, the capabilities and features improve as you migrate up the Emptoris product line to Enterprise. Emptoris' goal behind offering this variation of levels is to provide customers with a clear upward migration path as they begin their sourcing and supply management journey until they improve their processes and capabilities to the point where they need industry leading capabilities -- in other words, the premium bells and whistles which keep best of breed providers in business.
From a solution enhancement perspective, there are a couple of areas that Emptoris chose to focus on in Release 7. And focus they did, introducing a set up innovative enhancements in the supplier performance and sourcing areas (I'll tackle sourcing in a later post). From a supplier performance perspective, Emptoris 7 goes far beyond positioning performance as just a single add-on module. Rather, it is now part of the DNA of the suite, for those who select it. It includes what I'd describe as foundational elements of performance management including basic scorecarding, alerts and formulas, and trend analysis. But it also includes more advanced monitoring capabilities such as the ability to create an overall performance score that is rolled up from commodity or category analyses for specific suppliers. And it also includes the ability to deploy balanced scorecarding approaches as well. Also, from a supplier development perspective, Emptoris 7 features collaboration tools which enable procurement organizations to poll both suppliers and stakeholders to obtain feedback. Supporting this capability is a supplier interaction portal which enables suppliers to offer input as well as the ability to gather internal peer analysis using survey capabilities within an organization.
Outside of both basic and advanced performance measurement and information gathering, Emptoris 7 also now includes enhanced virtual supplier assessment capabilities which feature the ability to deploy qualitative interviews which can serve in place of -- or alongside -- traditional supplier audits. Personally, from a global sourcing perspective, I'd never recommend using this approach in lieu of on-site walkthroughs and inspections, but it's a neat capability nonetheless. Emptoris has also made available best practice templates for lean and Six Sigma. I was surprised to learn that they do not offer any out-of-the box industry-based certification or quality templates (e.g., TS) given the depth of the lean and Six Sigma survey capabilities. Still, the ability to not only monitor performance but to survey suppliers and conduct true virtual assessments can help organizations, as Emptoris puts it, develop a 360 degree view into supplier performance and supplier capabilities. And when linked to the compliance piece including spend visibility components, it can help organizations not just observe performance and take reactive measures, but to truly take proactive measures to track supplier compliance in performance and quality related areas.
Emptoris 7 also includes a set of capabilities which can be used from a supplier development perspective to create milestones and goals, project notifications, project linking (to scores, surveys, etc.), and a virtual team workspace. But at this point, I'd describe this collaborative environment as most useful on the indirect and services category areas -- it does not begin to approach the collaborative engineering and supplier development workspaces that a Co-Exprise or the PLM players have to offer. If Emptoris is going to get serious about dominating the performance management space for direct materials, they'll need to develop or buy additional capabilities here that create CAD-neutral 2D and 3D environments for sharing and collaborating on design information as part of supplier development programs. Until then, Emptoris' supplier development capabilities -- and that of every other pure play spend or supply management vendor -- will only really be useful from a process and high level category perspective for direct materials (not at the individual part, component or assembly level).
- Jason Busch














Given that they publicly stated they won't talk to me because I was and am "a technical and strategic consultant to at least one of our competitors *", and that you are also a strategic consultant to at least one of their competitors (who also happens to be a significantly more serious threat to them than the competition I work with), I have to wonder if they are going to let you get anywhere close to the level you need to get to in order to ferret out its weaknesses in addition to its strengths and where it will provide real benefit vs. where it will only provide perceived benefit because, let's face it, a lot of providers are giving supplier performance lip service these days, but few are actually delivering products that will yield either hard dollar savings or measurably reduced risk.
On a more positive note, since I'm just the devil's advocate and not the devil they might think I am, their multi-level solution offering could be good news for those companies who aren't ready for a full-fledged enterprise solution and don't have a million-plus to cough up just to test-drive a sourcing solution, as it will give these companies another option in a rapidly consolidating market-place.
* http://www.spendmatters.com/index.cfm/2007/4/28/Em...
I have done -- and do work -- for a lot of companies in this sector. At any given time, it's probably 4 or 5. Over 12 months, it's many more. Just like analysts and management consultants, I come in at the business and marketing level. I think Emptoris' concern with you is that you have done detailed architecturally and technology work for others in the sector. I am not passing judgment on their decision not to keep you in the loop, but my guess is that is their rationale.
I look forward to continuing to trade thoughts with you on Emptoris and others. Keep up your vendor analysis work. There is not enough of it out there, and the more we can each come to our own opinions and share them, the better off the sector will be.
BTW ... I will be discussing their new real-time optimization capabilities tomorrow.
Yes, I know ... but what I want to know is how deep you got into the product so we can compare your analysis of Emptoris with your analysis of Aravo with your analysis of Ketera (as I know for a fact that these vendors will give deep demonstrations of what the technology can do and sometimes skip the powerpoints altogether) and assign a probability of it meeting a potential customer's need vs. an alternative solution - something you can't really do if all you've seen is a powerpoint, because it's hard to know if that's what the product can do today, or if a future version of the product is also being discussed at the same time.
I'm not trying to beat them up ... they have a right to choose whom they do, and do not, talk to ... merely pointing out that I think it is important that you be very specific as to what you've seen and not seen as it's the only way some of us can judge whether or not they belong in the same category as another vendor who purports to have the same solution.
Not quite - I don't care about feature comparisons - what I care about is what it can do that other products can't, or that other products can't do as well, or as easily. This means diving in to the application, and looking for new capabilities that other applications don't have, or at least not at the same level.
Basically, when I say "I think you should also consider this vendor", I want to give the reader one or two solid reasons why they should be invited to the table to pitch their product as well - why they're not just a me-too competitor. I don't think that's being an analyst, because, for half the companies I write about, I couldn't tell you how they compared in an apples-to-apples comparison - I have no interest in reviewing an "add-to-cart" and "click here to approve payment" or "here's how you build an RFP from a template" function for the nth time - but I'm always interested in seeing, and then explaining, how something, or someone, has a novel approach that lets you view the sourcing world from a different angle. Even if it's not necessarily the right way to do it, because you'll never really know until you sampled the viewpoint for yourself!
Basically, I feel if you don't dive into the one or two key features that caused you to say "yeah, this is neat, I need to blog about this", I think it will be hard for your reader to reach the level of enlightenment you're hoping for because, not being experts, they often need more "meat to chew on" to really think about what it is you want them to think about.
Maybe I'm wrong, but that is probably where we differ in philosophies to blogging. ( We certainly don't differ on the importance of entertainment, although I'm sure you think I go to far. ;-) )
Regardless, you're the only blogger out there people can turn to if they really want to get a good, free, third party assessment / opinion of Emptoris and I want to do my part to help convince you to share all you can share!
Have fun at conference #3 ...
the doctor
... who will be at the 5th Int'l Supply Chain Mngmnt Symp. next week in Toronto for those who wish to express disagreeing viewpoints ...
Judging by the following of Spend Matters, I'd say there's enough meat on the bone here when it comes to vendor reviews and analysis. But the more, the merrier. There's not one "right" way to write a blog. That's for sure.
In general - obviously lots of meat (because if there wasn't I wouldn't be linking to this blog so often back here on a regular basis). Specifically, as with any blog, including mine, it depends on the post.
More specifically, I think it's really important you do deep dives into Emptoris because of the lack of free, objective coverage that is out there ... I know they work with Forrester a lot (and that Forrester covers them a lot), but like Gartner, and unlike AMR and Aberdeen, generally spaking, Forester doesn't make (at least decent size abstracts of) its coverage available to average Joe practitioner free of charge. (Whereas, as far as I can tell, once they have decided on and released a new product, Ariba has taken the opposite approach and instructed their PR team to talk with every analyst, reporter, blogger, and pet dog who will listen, making it much easier for average Joe practitioner to get a good handle on what they do, how they do it, why it might be appropriate to them, and why they should ( a) tell their boss that they need to look at it or ( b) seriously look at it when their boss is considering buying it and asking them to take time that they don't have out of their day to form an opinion.)
Since they're the #2 company in the space, I think it should be easy for average Joe practitioner, blogger, and analyst to get a good handle on what they're doing. But maybe I'm just asking too much ...