spend matters spend matters About this site

Want to reach procurement and supply chain decision-makers?

Advertise with Spend Matters Navigator
 

May 16, 2008

 

The Growing SaaS Spend Management Market

Even though I'm not a member of the SaaS politburo like On Demand junkie Tim Minahan -- who really is betting his retirement and kid's college tuition on SaaS' up-take -- I do count myself a card carrying party member of the movement. Given this, you can imagine I was pleasantly surprised to see Phil Waineright's post over on ZD Net about the growing SaaS market within Spend Management. In his blog, Phil comments that most SaaS supply chain and Spend Management players "remain privately held, including well-funded ventures such as Ketera and Rearden Commerce ... Then there are hosted supply chain vendors such as Mitrix, Emptoris and SAP acquisition Frictionless Commerce. Plus B2B trading services such as GXS. Maybe not a billion dollar sector yet but certainly in excess of a half billion." I know Phil's calculation and analysis is not scientific, but even if 2006 SaaS Spend Management revenue just comes close to $500 million, I'll still get excited. For that's just the tip of what I'm certain is a much bigger iceberg which will save companies significant money and reduce deployment risk over traditional applications. So Phil -- or Tim, for that matter -- my question to you is when will SaaS overtake the installed market in the Spend Management world? Or will it ...

- Jason Busch

Comments
I had a good conversation about this with Dave last week ... maybe he'll chime in! But I'm now convinced it all depends on where the early adopters are in their licensed-software depreciation cycles. So, if someone could tell us when the majority of the installed market will have fully depreciated their up-front investments, I think the huge attraction of monthly fees without up-front license fees (since they pay large maintenance fees with installed software anyway) will win a lot of converts as they rip-and-replace old systems with new, better, cheaper alternatives.
# Posted By Michael Lamoureux | 9/27/06 11:47 AM
SaaS is a red herring from my POV. The real issue is whether the application delivery mechanisim delivers some new level of value. SaaS clearly does when compared to traditional enterprise software benchmarks, but so do paradigms like open source and outsourcing. The SaaS approach to supply/spend management needs to set its sights on something higher than the whipping boy of ERP, and start thinking about what happens when the whole concept of installed applications seems as antiquated as baking your own bread.
# Posted By Kevin Brooks | 9/27/06 11:38 PM
Having been involved in a pioneering SaaS business in the late '90's, TPN Register (it was called outsourcing then), and running a software company now (with a SaaS-type offering of our solutions), I look at SaaS from this perspective. Enterprise Fortune 500 -type customer's loved the "plug and play" deployment, having another organization host and administer the solution, and the avoidance of high, up front license fees. What they didn't love were the limitations with regard to customizion, potential for data security issues, and the fact that if the provider shut down operations, they had minimum recourse (unlike licensing, where they can get escrow accounts and other protection).

So for SaaS to go mainstream for large companies, we need to address the things customer's don't love listed above (I'm sure I missed a few)...and I think we're getting there, thanks to advances in technology and just changes in attitude.

Re: the mid-market, SaaS will be a comet once somebody makes the pricing work, which is difficult due to, among other things, the costs of supplier enablement (catalogs, EDI, etc.) and potential erosion of price points at the enterprise software licensing level (e.g. Ariba Buyer is Ariba Buyer whether it's for a $20B company or a $20M company, other than the price charged)!
# Posted By Gary Hare | 9/29/06 8:38 AM
What does this trend suggest about corporate IT?

Is it safe to say that mult-tenant application providers manage data centers better - is it business functions (other than IT) response to not wanting to involve IT in the requisition process?
# Posted By Sam Morris | 10/7/06 6:56 AM
About Us | Advertise | Getting Started | How and Why | Contact Us   © 2004-2007 Spend Matters Publishing, Inc. All rights reserved.