spendmatters
 

February 08, 2012

 

It's the Data, Stupid -- ERP vs. Best of Breed (Round 923)

I recently read through this article in the CPO's Agenda that highlights some of the major arguments in favor of balancing ERP and best of breed investments. Recently, I've spoken with a number of folks who complain that a continued draw-back of ERP in the Spend Management arena -- especially in the areas of spend visibility and supplier performance management -- is the challenge of consolidating information across multiple, disparate systems. Granted, the performance and capabilities gap between best of breed and ERP is narrowing, but, as the article states, "The major ERP platforms ... are orientated towards capturing and consolidating data from their own databases, not those of competitors. In contrast, best-of-breed solutions -- almost by definition -- are designed from the ground up to work with a wide variety of data sources." Food for thought, as the battle between ERP and best of breed continues to go on.

- Jason Busch


Commodity Edge Conference

TweetBacks
Comments
Michael Lamoureux's Gravatar Old news ... I posted about this a whole 8 hours ago!
See: What about BoB? @
http://blog.sourcinginnovation.com/2006/08/09/what...

And yes, I think my title is catchier. ;-)
# Posted By Michael Lamoureux | 8/11/06 4:56 PM
Kevin Brooks's Gravatar Thanks Jason. I'm curious when people will start to realize that the ERP emperor has no clothes relative to the outrageous investments organizations make in them. I suppose too many IT careers and consulting gravy trains (not to mention Gartner analysts) are attached to that acronym to expect too much change too quickly. Call me crazy, but unless the ERP players can fundamentally reinvent themselves they're going to have a lot more to worry about than BoB vendors.
# Posted By Kevin Brooks | 8/11/06 5:38 PM
Jason Busch's Gravatar Michael,

Yours is a far more in-depth analysis than mine -- and I like the title as well. The danger of writing posts ahead of time is something like this happens. Needless to say, I would have absolutely given you credit had I read your post first, but alas, I wrote mine earlier in the week!
# Posted By Jason Busch | 8/12/06 5:12 AM
Eric Strovink's Gravatar I like Jason's title better.

A good example of ERP-inclusivity-idiocy is Kronos (http://www.kronos.com). I recall a number of years ago major ERP analysts, possibly in a simultaneous 20 watt flash of look-at-me-I-went-to-Business-School inspiration, agreeing solemnly with each other that time-and-attendance functionality would be subsumed by ERP systems, and that Kronos therefore couldn't possibly survive as a stand-alone company.

I guess a couple of ERP vendors actually believed them, so they made a stab at time-and-attendance functionality. Both of them wound up running for the hills with angry customers at their heels, when they eventually realized how difficult the vertical really is, and how much effort it would take to throw away everything they'd done and do it properly. These days? Well, they recommend Kronos.

Doesn't prove anything, but it's illustrative.
# Posted By Eric Strovink | 8/13/06 4:48 AM
Brett Beaubouef's Gravatar Thank you Jason for sharing your insight. We have all heard the proverb “A chain is only as strong as its weakest link.” Applying this concept to business software, we would conclude that a business solution is only as strong as its weakest integration. Usually overlooked and underestimated, integration is one of the most important factors to consider as part of a best of breed vs. integrated ERP solution. The benefit of richer functionality is limited by partial integration. For more information please see the following blog article: http://gbeaubouef.wordpress.com/2011/04/30/best-of...
# Posted By Brett Beaubouef | 4/30/11 3:20 PM
About Us | Advertising and Sponsorships | Advisory Services | Contact Us    © 2004-2012 Azul Partners, Inc. and Spend Matters. All Rights Reserved.