spend matters spend matters About this site
Advertise with Spend Matters
Advertise with Spend Matters
 

March 19, 2010

 

Spend Management @ Aberdeen: +1 -2

There's been some movement at Aberdeen in the past couple of months. As noted in a previous post on Spend Matters, Aberdeen added a new analyst, Andrew Bartolini, to cover the Spend Management area. Andrew joins Sudy Bharadwaj who has done excellent work covering a range of procurement and sourcing areas in recent months. But the addition of a new analyst in Aberdeen's supply management practice comes with the departure of two other from the supply chain area. John Fontanella -- ex-AMR and universally regarded as one of the top supply chain analysts -- and Jane Biddle are no longer listed on Aberdeen's site, and I've heard from various parties that both have left. The departure of two more heavy hitters and the addition of a new un-branded analyst signals to me that Aberdeen is investing more in standardized research methods rather than a model based on the expertise and brand cache of the individual. This model is certainly a bet. Aberdeen will need to prove that their brand carries clout even without the individually branded experts that they had on staff in the past. In contrast, Gartner has taken what appears to be a safer route by hiring someone with a solid reputation already in the market.

-
Jason Busch

Related Blog Entries

Comments
Unbranded? perhaps, but Andrew knows this industry as well as anybody in it. Ariba's loss is the overall industry's gain. He has worked to implement spend management solutions at a number of fortune 50 clients who are now more clearly managing spend, tallying up thousands of transactions and billions of dollars per year. Sure his direct experience is steep with Ariba applications, but he has bared witness more closely to real world scenarios, knows the tactical competitive landscape and will surely be best positioned to offer insight only afforded by his “hands-on” perspective. In the construction world, Bob Vila was/is just a mouth piece; Norm Abram is the real deal…. I see Andrew’s connection with Aberdeen as thier call to real carpentry….
# Posted By Former Client | 7/28/06 2:29 PM
OK Jamie - whatever you say. Sounds like some Aberdeen spin here.
# Posted By Sure | 7/29/06 7:16 PM
It should be said that I'm not knocking hiring an unbranded analyst. It seems Andrew's credentials are quite solid. But he is not a proven commodity in analyst land. The skill sets from industry and consulting do not necessarily transfer over. An analyst needs to be a reader of facts and fictions, a pundit, a prognosticator -- and hopefully an informed visionary. A consultant needs strength in project and program management, not to mention sales and client and team leverage. This says nothing to how good Andrew will or will not be, at Aberdeen, but as someone who has been an analyst, author, marketing geek, and management consultant in his career at different times, I can honestly say that all the skill sets are different. In my view, the first poster is drowning in equivocations to extrapolate past consulting and industry experience as evidence of future success in analyst land. They’re two different worlds.
# Posted By Jason Busch | 7/30/06 5:47 AM
The departure of Fontanella sends a clear signal that the only Aberdeen model is the Bedard model. How many top analysts have the left the company in the past 12 months? too many to list here but we all know whom they are.

Aberdeen does not care about research! they analysts they have left are not eperts in their fields, they move them around from research group to research group, over half of their so called analysts under the age of 25 and have never had practical experience in the field they cover.

From what I hear on the inside the ship is sinking and sinking fast.
# Posted By Robert Wilston | 8/1/06 10:23 AM
About Us | Advertising and Sponsorships | Advisory Services | Contact Us   © 2004-2010 Spend Matters, LP All rights reserved