spendmatters
 

May 16, 2012

 

Ariba's Analyst Day: IMHO

In most of my posts so far on Ariba's analyst day, I've tried to offer objective commentary over subjective analysis. But this post is an opportunity for me to indulge in the latter (which is far more fun). So where to begin? There's a number of lasting impressions I came away with from the day. So in no particular order, I'll rattle them off.

First, I believe Ariba needs to invest as much in marketing and promoting their services capabilities as they have in productizing and commercializing them. I consider myself very close to Ariba's services given that I spent five years at FreeMarkets, but I had no idea how far they had come from a services commercialization perspective. And if I'm out of the loop, 99.9999% of the market is too. Along the same lines, Ariba needs to better promote its specific consulting and services capabilities in hot areas (like commodity hedging strategy and global sourcing beyond China).

Second, given the breadth of Ariba's sourcing and supply chain advisory capabilities and the rising overall services market -- just look at the growth of the boutiques in the space and the hiring spree the Big 5 are on in the sector -- I believe that Ariba has come up short from a sales execution perspective, despite the growth their services teams are realizing. In my view, the challenge here is their large sales organization which does not know how to sell what can often be rather complicated services in new client opportunities. Because once Ariba introduces one of their more seasoned services professionals in a customer situation, they often perform much better selling over time (not surprising since consulting is a relationship game). But it's the initial sales piece which I believe must be hurting them. So what's my solution? I'd hire a bunch of more seasoned business developers on the services front apart from the enterprise sales team and I would give them the upside of partners at consulting firms.

Third, I think Ariba did a great job promoting the category and domain knowledge within their services team. Despite a brain drain that was sure to occur following the merger / acquisition, they've managed to keep a number of commodity experts and bring in others where needed (I know this point will generate controversy with some alums, but I must say that Ariba did a good job highlighting the knowledge of their category analysts during their analyst day).

Fourth, I believe Ariba is missing out on a big opportunity to further imbed and sell category and supply markets content within their applications. I know this is coming in the future, but the failure to monetize the real-time market knowledge in the heads of their supply markets experts in software perplexes me as much today as it did when I joined FreeMarkets in 1999. This could -- and should -- be a HUGE competitive advantage for Ariba. I'll leave my specific product and content suggestions for a one-on-one conversation with them, but my head is literally spinning on what they could be doing here.

Fifth, and last for this post, I believe that Ariba's services delivery model -- and their deployment of lean to streamline and improve services delivery -- should serve as an example for all large global procurement organizations. Transitioning to a shared services approach was not easy for FreeMarkets -- trust me, I was there when this was going on -- but the rewards it brought in increased margins, faster project cycle times, higher quality and consistency, and better results have more than made it worth the effort. As more and more companies use FreeMarkets -- and now Ariba's -- shared services sourcing organization as a model for their own, I suspect we'll see the gap widen between results top performers and more typical organizations achieve. And the better such world class organizations will be able to slot in services providers like Ariba exactly where they need them because of identified gaps and episodic needs rather than letting consultants live on site, hawking their wares and smarts continuously.

- Jason Busch


TweetBacks
Comments
Artie's Gravatar Jason...didn't you pump these guys enough in your multiple posts from last week. It seems a little over the top to re-post the same thoughts again and just seems like there are favorites being played.

The reality is that Ariba'a apps are very expensive and the extra cost does not translate into extra benefit. Also, the time to implement is just too long, costly and FULL OF RISK. Sure this is a contrary opinion but your "crystal palace" observations are nice but lets make sure the reality is presented as well.
# Posted By Artie | 11/9/06 7:01 AM
Jason Busch's Gravatar With apologies to Bill O'Reilly, this is a no spin zone. There's no pumping – or pimping -- of anyone here. I'm genuinely interested in what Ariba doing on the services front because they're different than others in how the organization is structured and how services are delivered, not to mention the fact that I have an old tie to the organization, and it is fun to see how far -- or in some cases not – they've come over the years. My posts are winding down on their analyst day, but I hope that you have found them to be a fair assessment as well as educational about how others can structure their own shared services capabilities.
# Posted By Jason Busch | 11/9/06 7:18 AM
Eric Strovink's Gravatar I agree that a consulting sale often requires the magic touch of a rainmaker (a senior partner equivalent), and that rainmakers need to be compensated properly.

I think, though, that the problem also extends further into the hierarchy. This has been an issue with every company that has tried to integrate consulting with product (there is a long litany of them). The consultant wage structure typically cannot be assimilated within the wage structure of a product/software company, which causes "stars" at every level to leave.

A more sustainable model for e-sourcing companies may be to partner with consulting firms, rather than attempting to run a consulting group out of the company itself. I suspect that small e-sourcing companies could compete very effectively with Ariba (and others) using this strategy.
# Posted By Eric Strovink | 11/9/06 9:52 AM
Artie's Gravatar Jason, I appreciate the comment and respect the attention and service you are providing to the sector. I do, however, respectfully ask that you review your comments and hold them to the same scrutiny to which you hold others -- analysts, reporters, etc.
# Posted By Artie | 11/9/06 9:54 AM
SpendFool's Gravatar Yo Artie,
Jason is talking about a firm that has saved more money for its clients than any competitor by an order of magnitude and is now (finally) stepping up and building an assemble-to-order spend management services business that can be a flexible and virtual extension of a firm's Procurement function. Yeah, being 5 separate businesses under one roof is a bit over-the-top, but you have to respect what they're trying to do, even if they themselves don't necessarily always know what they're doing and the potential of what they could be on the verge of building out. But you're complaining about the price/risk of the apps? Heck, what about price of ERP apps? What about the risk of using the munchkinville e-sourcing vendors that you rent until your long-term vendor builds out the functionality? If the market does ultimately go to a services model (app services, knowledge services, integration services, outsourcing services, etc.), they seem pretty well positioned to me. Bottom-line: they're adding value and Jason's adding value too. Let's elevate the discussion.
# Posted By SpendFool | 11/9/06 9:11 PM
anon's Gravatar Please define 'munchkinville eSourcing vendors' and give examples ?
# Posted By anon | 11/10/06 8:11 AM
anon's Gravatar I bet Spend Fool doesn't include Procuri in his list of 'munchkinville eSourcing vendors'
# Posted By anon | 11/10/06 1:17 PM
anon's Gravatar He has gone mighty quiet !
# Posted By anon | 11/13/06 1:51 AM
Jason Busch's Gravatar The fool must be holding court on a different RSS feed of late (or drinking too much of his own foolish kool-aid with the family) ... we would welcome his return to answer this question, as well as any other discerning words of wisdom he might have.
# Posted By Jason Busch | 11/13/06 5:18 AM
SpendFool's Gravatar Yes, Procuri is the mayor of munchkinville.
Hey, it's better than the lollipop kids.
But remember, the golden road to the emerald city starts in munchkinville, so, power to the little people and those who use them!
Why am I envisioning Shah Agassi behind the green curtain and Larry Ellison flying in on his MiG broomstick?!
But what about the others? Emptoris as the the Tin Man ("if I only had a heart"). Ariba as the Lion (getting courage up to get in the market's facea little bit). VerticalNet as the scarecow ("I would start to sell a license, if not for client's due diligence, and my darn competitors. My code I will escrow, and my business surely grow, if I only had a loan"). ahh, such folly.
fool out.
# Posted By SpendFool | 11/13/06 7:53 AM
About Us | Advertising and Sponsorships | Advisory Services | Contact Us    © 2004-2012 Azul Partners, Inc. and Spend Matters. All Rights Reserved.